The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Enforcement Directorate's response on a plea by AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal challenging a sessions court order upholding the summons issued to him in a money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy scam in the capital.
Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on the petition and asked it to file the counter affidavit within six weeks.
At the outset, the ED's counsel raised a preliminary objection over the maintainability of the petition and contended that this petition was in the form of second revision petition filed under the garb of a Section 482 (inherent power of high court) CrPC petition, which was not permissible.
The high court asked the ED's counsel to mention all his objections, including preliminary objection, in his reply and listed the matter for hearing on September 10.
Kejriwal has challenged a special court order dated September 17, 2024, by which his revision petition against a March 7, 2024, order of a magisterial court summoning him was dismissed.
Besides, he has challenged a sessions court order dated December 20, 2024, which upheld an October 24 order of a magisterial court refusing to transfer his case to another court.
The high court also issued notice on the second petition and asked the ED to file its response within six weeks. The court listed the matter for September 10.
The ED said the special court order has been challenged after almost 10 months.
On June 20, 2024, Kejriwal was granted bail by a trial court in the money laundering case but it was later stayed by the high court on the ED's plea.
On July 12, 2024, the Supreme Court granted interim bail to Kejriwal while referring to a larger bench three questions on the aspect of "need and necessity of arrest" under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The ED's money laundering case stems from an FIR lodged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) after Delhi Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena recommended a probe into the alleged irregularities in the implementation of the 2021-22 Delhi excise policy.
According to the ED and the CBI, irregularities were allegedly committed while modifying the excise policy and undue favours were extended to the licence holders.
The Delhi government implemented the policy on November 17, 2021, and scrapped it by the end of September 2022, amid allegations of corruption.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)