SC to hear plea raising concerns regarding pre-censorship of films in Jan

The apex court had in April 2017 sought responses from the Centre and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on the plea filed by veteran actor-director Amol Palekar

Supreme Court, SC
The matter came up for hearing before a bench of justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan. | Photo: Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Nov 19 2024 | 8:20 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would hear in January a plea which has raised the issue concerning pre-censorship of films.

The apex court had in April 2017 sought responses from the Centre and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on the plea filed by veteran actor-director Amol Palekar.

The matter came up for hearing before a bench of justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan.

"Why should all such petitions be filed directly before the Supreme Court," the bench asked.

The counsel appearing for the petitioner said the pleadings in the matter were complete.

"It is our respectful submission that documentaries do not fall within the definition of cinematograph as defined under the Act (Cinematograph Act)," the lawyer said.

When the lawyer referred to the prayers made in the plea, the bench observed it also relates to pre-censorship of films.

The petitioner's counsel said the government had notified the Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 2023 in August last year but that does not address the concerns raised in the petition.

He requested the bench to take up the matter for hearing in January and said he would place on record a short written synopsis.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre, said it would be better if the apex court has the advantage of a high court determination on the issues raised by the petitioner.

Bhati referred to the issue of regulations for Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms.

When the petitioner's counsel said that does not deal with documentaries, the law officer said, "It is a developing field."  "As requested by counsel for the petitioner(s), list these matters in the week commencing from January 15, 2025," the bench said.

The plea has challenged several provisions of the Cinematography Act and said pre-censorship of movies was irrelevant in the internet era.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtcensorshipIndian film industry

First Published: Nov 19 2024 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story