Zakia Jafri, widow of Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, who was killed in the 2002 Gujarat riots, passed away in Ahmedabad on Saturday.
She was a co-complainant in the Gulberg Society case, represented by Rajya Sabha member and senior advocate Kapil Sibal.
She had sought a probe into the 2002 Gujarat riots, challenging the clean chit given by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi (then Gujarat Chief Minister) and several others, alleging a "larger conspiracy" behind the violence.
Her husband, Ehsan Jafri, was among 69 people killed during the violence at the Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002.
Condoling her demise, Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera said she saw her "hope for justice" die before her eyes.
"Zakia Jafri died today. She saw the hope for justice die before her eyes. Future generations will hear the history of the 'new India' in Zakia Jafri's tears, sobs, fight for justice, and then her defeat," Khera wrote in a post on X.
In 2022, the Supreme Court had dismissed Jafri's plea, upholding the "clean chit" given to the Prime Minister and others in the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Teesta Setalvad, a human rights activist and another complainant in the Gulberg Society case, also condoled Jafri's passing.
"Zakia Appa a compassionate leader of the human rights community passed away just 30 minutes ago! Her visionary presence will be missed by the nation family friends & world! Tanveernhai, Nishrin, Duraiyaappa, grandkids we are with you! Rest in Power and Peace Zakia appa!" Setalvad wrote in a post.
Setalvad has been accused of fabricating evidence in the 2002 riots.
Kapil Sibal had also criticized the 2022 judgment while speaking at a People's Tribunal organized by various civil rights groups, saying there was "no hope left in the Supreme Court."
"If you think you will get relief from the Supreme Court, you are hugely mistaken. And I am saying this after completing 50 years of practising in the Supreme Court," Sibal had said.
In 2022, the Congress party had also called the Supreme Court verdict "deeply disappointing," stating that despite the ruling, "some fundamental questions remain unanswered.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)