ICAR rejects GM-Free India's claims of data rigging in genome rice

Coalition alleges trial data of Pusa DST-1 and DRR Dhan 100 rice varieties was rigged to show higher yields; ICAR calls the claims baseless and politically motivated

The Coalition for GM-Free India on Thursday wrote to Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, alleging that the official trial data of two recently released genome-edited rice varieties had been manipulated to manufacture false claims of success — an allegation immediately termed “baseless” and “motivated” by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).

 

The denial came hours after the coalition accused ICAR and the Ministry of Agriculture of rigging trial data for Pusa DST-1 and DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) — rice varieties announced by the minister on May 4, 2025.

 

Activists allege inconsistencies in trial data

 

At a press conference, the coalition presented data from ICAR’s Annual Progress Reports (2023 and 2024) of the All India Coordinated Research Project on Rice (AICRPR), alleging that official conclusions contradict actual field results.

 

The group claimed that Pusa DST-1, promoted for salinity tolerance, showed no yield advantage in 2024 coastal or inland salinity trials and underperformed in 12 of 20 sites in 2023.

 

It further alleged that the summary claim of “30 per cent higher yield” was based selectively on just eight locations in one zone.

 

For DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala), claimed to yield 17 per cent higher and mature 20 days earlier than the normal crop, the coalition said it underperformed in 8 of 19 trial sites in 2023 and showed only a three-day difference in flowering time, not 20 days as claimed.

 

“Doing bad science in agriculture, that too from the public sector, has a direct bearing on the lives and livelihoods of millions of farmers,” said Kavitha Kuruganti, activist and coalition member. 

 

Independent researcher Soumik Banerjee added: “If the technology being used is truly safe, precise, and effective, there should be no hesitation in putting out all data and conducting proper testing, as is done for all GMOs (genetically modified organisms).”

 

ICAR calls allegations ‘baseless and motivated’

 

ICAR, however, said both varieties were rigorously tested at over 24 locations under AICRPR, the nodal agency for rice variety evaluation since 1965.

 

“There was neither premature release of either of the genome-edited rice varieties nor were their testing results ‘rigged and hyped’. All the protocols and standard operating procedures prescribed by the Central Sub-Committee on Crop Standards, Notification & Release of Varieties under the Seed Act (1966) have been, and are being, strictly followed,” ICAR said in a statement.

 

The research body added that varieties were blind-coded during testing alongside 500-plus breeding lines annually to ensure unbiased evaluation. “All field performance data are publicly available online,” it said, referring to www.aicrip-intranet.in.

 

“Despite these transparent and scientifically validated evaluations, the Coalition for a GM-Free India continues to disregard evidence from over 24 independent testing centres across the country and persist with its agenda to block technological progress in agriculture,” ICAR added.

 

ICAR described the development as “a landmark achievement in India’s leadership in rice gene-editing technology” and “a milestone of national pride.”

 

Coalition demands independent review and moratorium

 

The coalition, meanwhile, has demanded the immediate withdrawal of promotional claims, an independent scientific review of trial data, and a moratorium on genome-edited crop releases until credible biosafety regulations are in place.