India must press accelerator on battery storage to power future growth

The next chapter of India's energy landscape demands policies that reflect an appetite for pushing the envelope, and proactive leadership that anticipates trends, invests in innovation

Battery
India should adopt a phased and flexible duty policy that supports initial local assembly of battery packs, then progressively expands to cell manufacturing and raw material processing.
Amitabh Kant
6 min read Last Updated : Sep 26 2025 | 10:27 PM IST
The lithium-ion battery is the backbone of modern energy, communication, and mobility systems in the 21st century. Its superior energy-to-weight ratio means devices can be smaller, lighter, and last longer, fundamentally transforming how we communicate, travel, and generate power. From powering smartphones and satellites to enabling electric vehicles (EVs) and stabilising renewable energy grids, these batteries have quickly become the foundation of national power, mobility, and digital sovereignty. While India has made initial efforts through programmes like the Advanced Chemistry Cell Production-Linked Incentive Scheme (ACC PLI), there is significant opportunity to further strengthen and accelerate the  country’s battery ecosystem.
 
Batteries now play a critical role in three national infrastructure layers: 
Communication: Ensuring reliable power for smartphones, laptops, 5G towers, and satellites. 
Energy storage: Supporting renewable energy integration by stabilising grids and enabling decentralised storage. 
Transport: Powering a growing fleet of electric vehicles across commercial, public, and personal transportation. 
India’s ambition for a clean, resilient energy future depends on developing reliable, affordable, and scalable battery solutions. With demand projected to reach 260 gigawatt-hours (GWh) annually by 2030, and potentially higher, given the country’s decarbonisation commitments across transport, railways, and the power sector, India has a strategic opportunity to become a global leader in this sector. 
Global trends: LFP, China, and the lithium-ion future 
For the past two decades, the world primarily relied on nickel, manganese, cobalt (NMC) chemistry as the standard for lithium-ion batteries. This meant that the key components — the cathode — were built using nickel, manganese, and cobalt, materials chosen for their high energy density and performance. But now, the international landscape is witnessing a transformative shift towards lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and advanced battery chemistries, which are inherently safer, have a longer cycle life, and use more environmentally friendly raw materials, making them especially suitable for large-scale storage and EVs.
There is growing consensus across nations that for the near future, our solution for short-duration energy storage is lithium-ion, and LFP is its workhorse. 
Today, China dominates the lithium-ion battery value chain — raw materials, cell manufacturing, pack assembly, and crucially, the deep know-how in process engineering and intellectual property (IP) protection. Over 75 per cent of global battery production happens in China. With rising geopolitical tensions, China has also begun limiting the transfer of core technologies, making it harder  for other countries to access high-efficiency manufacturing processes  and machinery.
 
In response, the United States, South Korea, and Europe are building regional value chains — investing in gigafactories, securing critical minerals, and reshoring R&D capabilities. While there are honest attempts by some industrial players like Tata, Reliance, Ola, Exide, and Amara Raja, Indian companies need additional support to build our first stabilised gigafactory and become truly independent of China’s decisions. 
In order to shift from a passive observer to a global player shaping this new energy order, the Department of Heavy Industries needs to adopt a more proactive and supportive approach to nurture the domestic battery industry. The current phased manufacturing programme, including the ACC PLI scheme, which was crafted for a different geopolitical landscape, has not delivered desired results. It is now crucial for the department to reassess strategy and take inspiration from successful elements of the electronics PLI scheme, such as  combining targeted subsidies with global marketing efforts and confidence-building measures to accelerate India’s battery ecosystem.
 
India’s lithium-ion strategy  needs a reboot   India’s current approach must evolve from focusing only on capacity targets to building deep industrial and design capabilities. Here’s a five-point agenda to press the accelerator:
 
1. From capacity to capability 
India must move beyond merely setting gigawatt-hour capacity targets and instead focus on developing deep expertise in battery product design and manufacturing processes, adopting models similar to East Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, and China. These nations have mastered the art of integrated, high-precision manufacturing, which includes advanced pack and cell design, sophisticated materials engineering, innovative coating techniques, electrode chemistry, and thermal management systems. Building this level of technical mastery will help India transform into a competitive producer of high-quality, competitive batteries, capable of meeting both domestic and global demand.
 
2. Replicate the electronics playbook 
India’s rise in electronics manufacturing was enabled by a blend of demand creation, software, marketing, shop floor, and industrial engineering talent, working in tandem with foreign partners — particularly China. A similar collaborative approach in batteries — especially in the early phases — can help India climb the value chain faster.
 
3. Flexible and risk-sharing PLI policies 
The current ACC PLI scheme is too rigid and needs greater operational flexibility to effectively support emerging domestic players. In its current form, early Indian entrants face higher technology, capital, and execution risk, which acts as a deterrent. Those who have not yet delivered should be carefully evaluated and weeded out, and a new, more agile process should be undertaken, focused on clear outcomes and consistent delivery. In tandem, the government should actively engage and support leading Indian industrial giants — such as Tata, Reliance, Ola, Amara Raja, Exide, JSW, and L&T — and empower them to become world-class champions in battery product design and manufacturing, leveraging all available resources and policies to make this possible.
 
4. Focused innovation in battery design
 
While India may be playing catch-up in manufacturing, it has a prime opportunity to lead in battery  design and innovation. Indian engineering institutions, startups, and automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) must focus on battery design, simulation, testing, and integration, covering everything from novel cell formats to advanced pack cooling. The government should  organise a Grand Challenge for a ‘Bharat cell design’ that is better than any cell in the world.
 
5. Adaptive duty regimes 
India should adopt a phased and flexible duty policy that supports initial local assembly of battery packs, then progressively expands to cell manufacturing and raw material processing. This approach must promote scale and competitiveness while carefully ensuring that barriers do not hinder the import of advanced technologies and innovation.
  The next chapter for India’s energy landscape should not be about keeping pace but rather setting it.  If we want to make the most of cutting-edge technologies, then our  policies need to reflect a similar  appetite for pushing the envelope.  
This requires a shift from  reactive measures to proactive leadership: Anticipating industry trends,  investing in innovation, and creating  an environment where homegrown  solutions can thrive. 
 
The author was India’s G20 Sherpa and is former CEO of NITI Aayog. He serves as Senior Advisor to Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd, and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, and is on the boards of IndiGo and HCLTech. Views expressed are personal

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :BS OpinionBattery makersenergy sector

Next Story