Rupee internationalisation aims to reduce business risk: T Rabi Sankar

RBI Deputy Governor T Rabi Sankar says rupee internationalisation aims to reduce risk for Indian firms, not replace the dollar, and warns that stablecoins pose macro risks

The internationalisation of the Indian rupee is not to replace the dollar but to reduce risk for Indian businesses by enabling more transactions in the domestic currency, according to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Deputy Governor T Rabi Sankar. In conversation with Tamal Bandyopadhyay at the Business Standard BFSI Insight Summit 2025, Sankar also explains how stablecoins are a risk to the Indian economy. Since then, the RBI has also flagged that risks from stablecoins to macrofinancial stability outweigh their purported benefits, in its Financial Stability Report (FSR) released in December 2025. Edited excerpts:

 

The RBI has issued new norms for external commercial borrowing and foreign exchange liberalisation on foreign currency borrowing by Indian companies, removing the cost caps, widening eligible borrowers, lenders, expanding end users, raising the borrowing limit to 300 per cent, why are we opening up so many things so fast? 

These are not short-term measures. If you look at the Reserve Bank’s stance on capital account convertibility, we have fairly consistently been saying that it is a process, not an event. In this spirit, we have gradually been liberalising the capital account. Today, barring a few constraints like cost caps and amount limits on ECBs, most inward capital flows are liberalised. What remains more under control is how much can go outward, which aligns with our stage of development. Regarding ECBs, we’ve taken several steps over the years to simplify processes, such as derivative use and commodity hedging. Trade flows are also being liberalised as part of the effort to make foreign exchange transactions smoother and more convenient. 

The current ECB proposals, still in draft form, aim to ensure that only financially strong entities borrow abroad. Instead of cost caps, we now link permissible borrowing to a firm’s leverage. Once this framework is finalised, cost caps and other limits may no longer be necessary. This is not a sudden move, it’s a continuation of a decades-long process of gradual liberalisation. We are still in the discussion stage, and will finalise after reviewing feedback, likely in the next couple of months.

 

Against the backdrop of global uncertainties, what would be the next stage of relaxations in terms of capital account convertibility, since the Indian rupee is only partially convertible to the capital account? 

Trade is largely free, with only procedural requirements such as repatriation timelines. We have already released two draft proposals to simplify trade regulations reducing over 100 directives to a single comprehensive framework. ECB liberalisation is part of this broader effort. Our priority remains facilitating inflows of capital first, followed by calibrated outflows. 

We started a policy and want to see results immediately. But many reforms take a long time to bear fruit. How do you see this in the context of internationalisation of the rupee? 

Policy-making often involves preparing the ground for the future. Digital payments, for instance, took years after introducing two-factor authentication to really take off. Similarly, internationalising the rupee is a long-term process. The goal isn’t to replace the dollar — that’s unrealistic — but to reduce risk for Indian businesses by enabling more transactions in rupees. This reduces currency exposure for exporters and contributes to a more balanced global system, where multiple currencies play a role. 

 

Despite all the talk, the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) hasn’t really taken off. Where is CBDC, and why should I use it if I already have Unified Payments Interface (UPI), which gives me interest on deposits, while CBDC does not? 

You have asked two questions; where CBDC is, and why CBDC. Let me take them one by one. On the ‘where’, CBDC is progressing as a pilot from 2022. We are not rushing it because most countries are still experimenting and studying its impact. Over 10 crore transactions have taken place, but we are going slow to understand potential effects. For instance, whether CBDCs could replace bank deposits. We’re also testing “programmable” CBDC use cases such as government benefits, or education loans that can be spent only on specific items. On the ‘why’, CBDC enables things that existing systems can’t, notably programmability and cross-border efficiency. Domestic payment systems like UPI work well, but cross-border transfers remain slow and expensive. CBDC can settle such transactions instantly and cheaply, without intermediaries. That’s why we see CBDC as uniquely useful, though the global understanding of token money is still evolving.

 

Is there any change in your approach to cryptocurrency, especially with stablecoins being legalised in some countries? 

No, our stance remains unchanged. Both unbacked cryptocurrencies and stablecoins pose significant risks. Our analysis continues to show that cryptocurrencies do not serve any legitimate purpose that existing forms of money can’t serve better. Unbacked cryptos have no underlying cash flows or issuer, hence no intrinsic value. Stablecoins, while backed, pose risks of currency substitution and loss of monetary sovereignty, especially for emerging markets like India. We believe CBDC can meet all legitimate use cases of stablecoins, without those risks.

 

For years we’ve had two-factor authentication, but now there’s an alternative authentication framework. Can you explain the new system? 

Actually, we may not even have needed a regulation. Two-factor authentication has become synonymous with OTPs, though technology now allows more secure alternatives. Fraudsters evolve, so authentication methods must evolve too. The new framework allows flexibility. OTP remains valid, but is no longer the only option. 

 

On foreign exchange reserves, the RBI has churned a substantial portion in recent years, making profits by selling old holdings and buying at higher prices. With the old stock depleting, will your ability to generate profits and pay dividends to the government reduce? 

Yes, if earnings change, surplus transfers will also change. But that’s incidental. The central bank doesn’t operate with profit as an objective. Surplus transfers come mainly from seigniorage income, which belongs to the people and is rightly passed on to the government. As for valuation, we follow standard accounting holdings that are recorded at average acquisition cost, and profits or losses are booked against that. So, even though the average cost rises over time, it balances out. Depending on exchange rate movements, sales can yield either profit or loss.