- Declassified US report envisions India's growing role in Indo-Pacific
- AIIMS panel advises to take Union minister Shripad Naik off ventilator
- 10 mn cases in 2020: More Indians got Covid-19 than any infectious disease
- Top headlines: 5.6 mn vaccine doses shipped; Nifty achieves new milestone
- LIVE: US House formally calls on Mike Pence to remove Trump from office
- 'Farmers will get justice', says member of SC panel on farm laws Ghanwat
- Haryana govt rolls out one-time registration portal for job aspirants
- Over 1k bird deaths reported; Centre issues advisories on testing, culling
- After SC intervention, farmers should withdraw protest: Punjab BJP
- Will confront China till acceptable solution is found, says Army chief
AAP vs LG: 'Anarchist' Kejriwal undermining SC and democracy, says BJP
Justice Sikri held that transfers and posting of officers of and above the rank of Joint Secretary are under the powers of lieutenant-governor and other officers are under the control of Delhi Govt
In a setback to the AAP government in Delhi, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday gave a split verdict on the contentious issue of who should control administrative services but appeared to agree that the Centre has the final word.
In view of the differences, Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan referred the matter to a larger bench of the apex court.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, whose Aam Aadmi Party has been accusing the Centre of appointing such officers who create hurdles in the works of the AAP government, termed the verdict as "unfortunate" and said it was ironic that a chief minister can't have power to appoint even a peon in his office.
The two judges, who were hearing pleas on six matters pertaining to a long-running conflict between the Narendra Modi government at the Centre and the AAP government in the national capital, gave a unanimous order on the remaining five issues.
Both judges agreed that the Lieutenant Governor (L-G) will have control over the Anti-Corruption Bureau, as already notified by the Centre, and the power to appoint inquiry commissions would also rest with the central government.
On the other hand, the elected Delhi government will have the right to appoint public prosecutors, to decide land revenue matters and also to appoint or deal with electricity commission or board, the bench ruled.