You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » National
Business Standard

'Misinformed, misleading': Ministry of Defence hits back at Rahul Gandhi

The MoD's five-point statement was issued just hours after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had "ceded" Indian territory in Ladakh to the Chinese

Rahul Gandhi | India China border row | Ministry of Defence

Ajai Shukla  |  New Delhi 

Rajnath Singh
MoD pointed out that Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had already communicated the factual position to Parliament

Lashing out at “misinformed and misleading comments… regarding the disengagement currently underway at Pangong Tso”, the (MoD) issued a written statement on Friday, explaining precise details of the disengagement plan hammered out by senior military officers from India and China.

The MoD’s five-point statement was issued just hours after Congress leader alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had “ceded” Indian territory in Ladakh to the Chinese.

This is the first time during the ongoing crisis that the government has officially and publicly clarified details relating to deployment or disengagement.

Pointing out that Defence Minister had already communicated the factual position to Parliament, the MoD said it was nevertheless necessary “to set the record straight and counter certain instances of wrongly understood information being amplified in media and social media.”

First, the MoD statement made the academic, but important, point that India’s territorial claim extended well beyond Pangong Tso, and that our claimed border with China was distinct from the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which was the result of Chinese aggression in 1962. India continues to exercise that claim.

“The assertion that Indian territory is up to Finger 4 is categorically false. The territory of India is as depicted by the map of India, and includes more than 43,000 square kilometres currently under illegal occupation of China since 1962,” stated the MoD.

Second, the MoD dealt with the alignment of the LAC, rejecting news reports that said it ran through Finger 4 to the Pangong Tso lake. Indian troops have always patrolled up to Finger 8 and the MoD clearly stated that it continued to assert that claim.

ALSO READ: LAC disengagement: Cong attacks govt, Rahul alleges PM 'ceded' territory

“Even the Line of Actual Control, as per the Indian perception, is at Finger 8, not at Finger 4. That is why India has persistently maintained the right to patrol up to Finger 8, including in the current understanding with China,” stated the MoD.

Third, the MoD made the distinction between "permanent posts" of India and China, in which troops were stationed for significant periods; and “forward deployments”, which were closer to the LAC and where patrols would camp for perhaps a night or two. The agreement allowed troops from both sides to continue occupying their “permanent posts” north of Pangong Tso, but not to proceed any closer to the LAC.

“Permanent posts of both sides at the north bank of Pangong Tso are longstanding and well-established. On the Indian side, it is Dhan Singh Thapa Post near Finger 3 and on the Chinese side, east of Finger 8. The current agreement provides for cessation of forward deployment by both sides and continued deployment at these permanent posts,” stated the MoD.

Fourth, the MoD statement addressed accusations from the Opposition that Indian troops had been barred from entering their own territory. “India has not conceded any territory as a result of this agreement. On the contrary, it has enforced observance and respect for LAC and prevented any unilateral change in the status quo,” the MoD statement said.

Fifth, and finally, the MoD rebutted accusations that it had made a deal with China in Pangong Tso, but ignored the far more worrying Chinese incursions in the Depsang sector; and in Gogra and Hot Springs.

“Raksha Mantri’s statement also made clear that there are outstanding problems to be addressed, including at Hot Springs, Gogra, and Depsang. The outstanding issues are to be taken up within 48 hours of the completion of the Pangong Tso disengagement,” said the MoD.

It is not clear whether the Chinese would respond after India took up the issues of Depsang, Gogra, and Hot Springs. So far, the Chinese negotiators have refused to discuss those.

The MoD statement was silent on why it had agreed to disengagement in the South Bank of the Pangong Tso, where Indian troops held dominating heights on the Kailash Range and, consequently, held a tactical advantage over the Chinese posts nearby. It has been argued that India should have held back on disengagement from the Kailash Range, using that as a trump card to force Chinese concessions in areas such as Depsang, where they hold the advantage.

Finally, the MoD statement played the “nationalism card”, accusing those who questioned the disengagement plan of “disrespecting” the sacrifice of our brave soldiers.

“The effective safeguarding of our interest and territory in the Eastern Ladakh sector has taken place because the government has reposed full faith in the capabilities of the armed forces. Those who doubt the achievements made possible by the sacrifices of our military personnel are actually disrespecting them”, said the MoD.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Sat, February 13 2021. 00:14 IST