 "Photo: Dalip Kumar")
Here’s a question that is troubling many people in the wake of the YES Bank collapse: If the stability of the financial system wobbles because one bank screws up, why should taxpayers save the shareholders?
Good question because this has become the standard practice in all countries. It’s grossly unfair but many think it’s justified even though it results in what economics calls ‘moral hazard’.
The concept refers to a situation where insurance increases the propensity of the insured to take higher risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks. This also renders meaningless the traditional warning of
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper
