In much of the globe, when a large borrower defaults, he is contrite and desperate to show that the lender should continue to trust him with management of the enterprise. In India, too many large borrowers insist on their divine right to stay in control despite their unwillingness to put in new money. The firm and its many workers, as well as past bank loans, are the hostages in this game of chicken - the promoter threatens to run the enterprise into the ground unless the government, banks, and regulators make the concessions that are necessary to keep it alive. And if the enterprise regains health, the promoter retains all the upside, forgetting the help he got from the government or the banks - after all, banks should be happy they got some of their money back! No wonder, government ministers worry about a country where we have many sick companies but no "sick" promoters.Let me emphasise that I do not intend in any way to cast aspersions on the majority of Indian businesspeople who t

Buzzing :

Raghuram G Rajan

Raghuram G Rajan

Raghuram G Rajan

'Who pays for this one-way bet large promoters enjoy?'