Page 8 - Arbitration
Double-edged sword for London's arbitration crown
Brussels Regulation and Rome Convention I and II will not apply to the UK
 "Double-edged sword for London's arbitration crown")
SC lifts corporate veil on share deals
The Supreme Court lifted the corporate veil and upheld the cancellation of plot for an information technology campus because a Singapore company, the allottee, transferred the plot to a Dubai company without approval. In this case, Estate Officer, UT Chandigarh vs Esys Information Technologies Ltd, the plot was allotted for running an institution. However, the Singapore firm transferred its shares to a Dubai firm, Esys Global Holdings. There was another disputed transfer of shares to a Chennai firm. The estate officer asked the allottee company about the share transactions and nature of the business. He did not get a satisfactory answer. Therefore, he threatened to take back the land. The company moved the high court. It stayed the take-over. On appeal, the Supreme Court set aside the high court order. It stated that the company had concealed facts about the share transfers and not come to the court with "clean hands". There was a sale, not mere transfer of shares. The judgement emphas
Time limit in arbitration will help speedy disposal: ex-justice Mudgal
New bill stipulates arbitral tribunal is required to render an award within 12 months from date of appointment of arbitrators
 "Time limit in arbitration will help speedy disposal: ex-justice Mudgal")