ALSO READNHRC demands detailed report on 116 malnutrition deaths from MP govt Shocking: Nine leading food and beverages brands in India lag behind in high nutritional quality Poorly planned urbanisation pattern may impose $1.8 trillion cost Corbion to market BASF's human nutrition products in North America Centre frames infra policy to check challenges of urbanisation
The world has vowed to eliminate poverty and hunger by 2030 as part of 169 sustainable development goals adopted in 2015. Yet, increasing urbanisation is posing new challenges to progress, according to a new report, and India is particularly vulnerable because it faces an additional twin burden of under- and over-nutrition.
The 2017 Global Food Policy Report–released by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)–studied the developments in food policy around the world in 2016 with a “special focus on the challenges and opportunities created by rapid urbanisation, especially in low- and middle-income countries, for food security and nutrition”.
“India faces a paradoxical situation—its rapid economic growth is coupled with a much slower decline in undernutrition,” the sixth annual report noted.
Source: Food & Agriculture Organization
Note: Figures are three-year averages
Why does India need a fresh approach?
Of 32 million people who moved from rural areas to urban areas between 2001 and 2011, according to migration data from Census 2011, 7.4 million moved for work/business while 10.4 million moved with the household. Nearly 17% of India’s urban population, or more than 65 million people, lives in slums, a number that has more than doubled over three decades, IndiaSpend reported in March 2015.
As much as 78% of India’s workforce is employed in the informal sector (excluding agriculture), which is mostly based in urban and semi-urban areas, the report said, citing this 2012 study.
“Poor urban dwellers face unique nutritional challenges around accessing nutritious food, adequate employment, social protection, and adequate water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities, all of which affect food security and nutrition,” the IFPRI report said.
The lack of new and complete data on the extent of food insecurity in urban areas needs to be urgently addressed by comprehensive research, the report suggested. With most welfare programmes aimed at rural areas, the poorest of the urban poor remain vulnerable.
“Distress migration to urban areas, unlike developmental migration, is urbanising the issue of food insecurity,” Anjani Kumar, research fellow at the IFPRI’s South Asia Regional Office and an author of the report, told IndiaSpend.
While there is a positive discrimination towards rural areas in dealing with challenges–for instance, the targeted public distribution system (PDS) aims to cover 75% of rural households and 50% of urban households under NFSA–programmes such as seeding PDS beneficiaries with their Aadhaar numbers will help avoid duplication and pilferages, Kumar said, adding that increased efficiency in PDS will enable an enhancement of coverage by 30% or more, thereby reaching urban slums.
The twin-burden of under- and overnutrition
India is now faced with the twin-burden of under- and overnutrition. While 38.4% of children under the age of five are stunted (low height-for-age) and 21% are wasted (low weight-for-height), according to the National Family Health Survey, 2015-16 (NFHS-4), a study, conducted in 2012 over a period of six months on 18,001 students aged five to 18 from 27 schools, found 9.5% overweight and 3% obese, IndiaSpend reported in April 2016.
Also, while 22.9% and 20.2%, respectively, of women and men have body mass indices below normal, 20.7% and 18.6%, respectively, were overweight or obese, according to NFHS-4 data.
While low body mass indices were more prevalent in rural areas, obesity and overweight were more prevalent in urban areas.
Source: National Family Health Survey, 2015-16; *Body Mass Index < 18.5 kg/m2; **Body Mass Index > 25.0 kg/m2
Nutrition transition: How changing diets call for renewed policies
Studies showed that, with urbanisation, people’s diets are changing:
- Urban populations tend to consume more calories, yet a lower proportion of these calories comes from cereals or carbohydrates and more comes from fat.
- Urban populations consume more meat and other protein, or consume different animal protein sources than rural counterparts, but less dairy.
- They also consume more fruits and vegetables overall, though consumption of these food groups differs between richer and poorer urban populations.
- Urban dwellers consume more non-basic foods, including sugary snacks among children, food away from home, and processed foods.
A study in an urban slum in Delhi, cited in the IFPRI report, found that 66% of households consume packaged snacks high in fat, with two-thirds consuming these daily.
With more people adopting ‘urban diets’, there have been some changes in the food supply change. For instance, the move away from staples such as rice and wheat to vegetables, fruits, dairy, meat and fish requires more infrastructure such as cold storage, etc. There is also a growing preference for retail supermarkets over traditional markets among urban consumers.
A study of prices of potato and rice in Delhi, Beijing and Dhaka showed that margins were ‘slim’, the IFPRI report said. On average, a farmer made 69% of the retail price for rice in Delhi.
This is because the government sets a minimum support price for paddy–and because unlike perishables such as fruits and vegetables, handling costs are lower, Kumar said.
As port-farmgate functions–such as storage, transportation and distribution–play an important role in prices and employment, policy makers should pay greater attention to the segment, the report said. Price shocks affect the poorest of the urban poor.
“The government launched a Unified Agricultural Marketing e-Platform in April 2016, a big milestone in improving farmers’ access to markets,” the report noted.
While some farmers in some states are benefitting from the electronic National Agriculture Market and the Agriculture Produce Market Committees, the results are not widespread, and farmers continue to suffer due to the lack of direct contact with buyers/consumers, IFPRI’s Kumar told IndiaSpend.
No more than 12% of beverages and 16% of foods sold by nine leading Indian food and beverage companies were of “high nutritional quality”, according to the Access to Nutrition Index India Spotlight, 2016, the first survey of its kind, as IndiaSpend reported in March 2017.
(Madhavapeddi is a desk editor with IndiaSpend.)