You are here: Home » International » News » Politics
Business Standard

It's in the EU's interest to press ahead with Brexit negotiations

Delaying Brexit negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about direction of its future

Nieves Perez-Solorzano | The Conversation 

Brexit
UN and Union flags fly above Parliament Square in London

The extraordinary outcome of the general election and the uncertain domestic political climate has led to calls by Scottish first minister for a “short pause” in the Brexit process. Despite this, Brexit negotiations are now scheduled to begin on June 19.

There are no advantages for the in delaying or pausing negotiations. It is ready and waiting to negotiate an orderly British withdrawal – and keen to press ahead to limit the uncertainty caused by

Delaying the negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about the direction of Meanwhile, the is eager to address other challenges such as the or an increasingly unpredictable environment. A pause would also increase legal uncertainty: there is no agreement on whether it is legally possible to stop the Article 50 process, so the Court of Justice of the EU might have to intervene.

The UK’s negotiating position outlined before the election appears under pressure as the prime minister, Theresa May, no longer has a parliamentary majority to sustain it. The outcome of the election has increased the influence of those within the Conservative Party, such as leader of the Conservatives in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, who favour membership of the single market, continuation of free movement and building cross-party consensus over the direction of

The expected controversial “supply and confidence” agreement with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has knocked May’s “no deal is better than a bad deal” mantra on the head. A solution to the Irish border issue – which requires a deal – has moved top of the agenda.

But until the government sits at the table and outlines its negotiating position, the is hostage to the partisan interests of the Conservative government. As Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator put it, talks should start when the “is ready”, but that: “I can’t negotiate with myself”.

After meeting British negotiators Olly Robbins and Tim Barrow on June 12, Barnier told journalists he needs a British delegation that “is stable, accountable and that has a mandate”.

Momentum with the EU

Once the triggered in March, beginning a two-year countdown to leaving the bloc, the balance of power tilted in favour of the EU, putting pressure on the

Despite the legal disagreement on whether can be withdrawn once triggered, and the Council’s negotiating guidelines do afford the flexibility tools to adapt to changes during the process. These include the possibility to extend the formal two-year negotiation period and to agree transitional arrangements.

The calculated deployment of these tools could help the limit future uncertainty. But it is not currently in the EU’s interest to either use this ability to extend the talks – or to press pause. Doing so would give the momentum back to the UK, and allow it to switch on and off the process at will – which goes against the spirit of the article itself.

The pressure of the two-year time frame on the British government is evident in reports of an EU threat to delay Brexit negotiations for a year if the UK insists on negotiating the terms of a new trade deal at the same time as its divorce proceedings from the bloc. Barnier’s mandate is to negotiate the UK’s withdrawal from the EU – not a future trade agreement. If the UK insists on negotiating an exit and a trade agreement in parallel, Barnier would need a new mandate from the European Council – and agreeing this might take a year. All the while, the Brexit clock continues ticking, and the time frame to negotiate a deal shortens.

Politically, the is in a strong position. The 27 member states have presented a solid, unified voice over The eurosceptic threat has weakened after pro-European Emmanuel Macron’s electoral success in and Angela Merkel’s expected re-election in September. The Eurozone’s economic performance has also recently improved. So it is to the EU’s advantage to harness this political capital and press on with the negotiations while it is in a strong position, rather than accommodating the needs of a weakened British government.

The Conversation logo

Under the current time frame, the deadline to reach a divorce deal is the end of March 2019. If there were to be a delay, elections, scheduled for May or June 2019, could potentially limit the length of any extension to just over two months so that the process would not overlap with the campaign and vote.

If a delay did mean negotiations overlapped or went beyond the 2019 elections, these are typically fought on national issues and the status of negotiations may well have some impact on voters’ choices. Of course, British MEPs standing in the election would be contesting an election to serve a shorter term.

There is no need for the to delay or press pause before the negotiations start. The has tools at its disposal to adapt to a changing environment now that the process has been set in motion. In the meantime, the clock is ticking and the pressure to get talking is felt more strongly in than in


Nieves Perez-Solorzano, Senior Lecturer in European Politics, University of Bristol

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

The Conversation

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

It's in the EU's interest to press ahead with Brexit negotiations

Delaying Brexit negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about direction of its future

Delaying Brexit negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about direction of its future

The extraordinary outcome of the general election and the uncertain domestic political climate has led to calls by Scottish first minister for a “short pause” in the Brexit process. Despite this, Brexit negotiations are now scheduled to begin on June 19.

There are no advantages for the in delaying or pausing negotiations. It is ready and waiting to negotiate an orderly British withdrawal – and keen to press ahead to limit the uncertainty caused by

Delaying the negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about the direction of Meanwhile, the is eager to address other challenges such as the or an increasingly unpredictable environment. A pause would also increase legal uncertainty: there is no agreement on whether it is legally possible to stop the Article 50 process, so the Court of Justice of the EU might have to intervene.

The UK’s negotiating position outlined before the election appears under pressure as the prime minister, Theresa May, no longer has a parliamentary majority to sustain it. The outcome of the election has increased the influence of those within the Conservative Party, such as leader of the Conservatives in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, who favour membership of the single market, continuation of free movement and building cross-party consensus over the direction of

The expected controversial “supply and confidence” agreement with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has knocked May’s “no deal is better than a bad deal” mantra on the head. A solution to the Irish border issue – which requires a deal – has moved top of the agenda.

But until the government sits at the table and outlines its negotiating position, the is hostage to the partisan interests of the Conservative government. As Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator put it, talks should start when the “is ready”, but that: “I can’t negotiate with myself”.

After meeting British negotiators Olly Robbins and Tim Barrow on June 12, Barnier told journalists he needs a British delegation that “is stable, accountable and that has a mandate”.

Momentum with the EU

Once the triggered in March, beginning a two-year countdown to leaving the bloc, the balance of power tilted in favour of the EU, putting pressure on the

Despite the legal disagreement on whether can be withdrawn once triggered, and the Council’s negotiating guidelines do afford the flexibility tools to adapt to changes during the process. These include the possibility to extend the formal two-year negotiation period and to agree transitional arrangements.

The calculated deployment of these tools could help the limit future uncertainty. But it is not currently in the EU’s interest to either use this ability to extend the talks – or to press pause. Doing so would give the momentum back to the UK, and allow it to switch on and off the process at will – which goes against the spirit of the article itself.

The pressure of the two-year time frame on the British government is evident in reports of an EU threat to delay Brexit negotiations for a year if the UK insists on negotiating the terms of a new trade deal at the same time as its divorce proceedings from the bloc. Barnier’s mandate is to negotiate the UK’s withdrawal from the EU – not a future trade agreement. If the UK insists on negotiating an exit and a trade agreement in parallel, Barnier would need a new mandate from the European Council – and agreeing this might take a year. All the while, the Brexit clock continues ticking, and the time frame to negotiate a deal shortens.

Politically, the is in a strong position. The 27 member states have presented a solid, unified voice over The eurosceptic threat has weakened after pro-European Emmanuel Macron’s electoral success in and Angela Merkel’s expected re-election in September. The Eurozone’s economic performance has also recently improved. So it is to the EU’s advantage to harness this political capital and press on with the negotiations while it is in a strong position, rather than accommodating the needs of a weakened British government.

The Conversation logo

Under the current time frame, the deadline to reach a divorce deal is the end of March 2019. If there were to be a delay, elections, scheduled for May or June 2019, could potentially limit the length of any extension to just over two months so that the process would not overlap with the campaign and vote.

If a delay did mean negotiations overlapped or went beyond the 2019 elections, these are typically fought on national issues and the status of negotiations may well have some impact on voters’ choices. Of course, British MEPs standing in the election would be contesting an election to serve a shorter term.

There is no need for the to delay or press pause before the negotiations start. The has tools at its disposal to adapt to a changing environment now that the process has been set in motion. In the meantime, the clock is ticking and the pressure to get talking is felt more strongly in than in


Nieves Perez-Solorzano, Senior Lecturer in European Politics, University of Bristol

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

The Conversation
image
Business Standard
177 22

It's in the EU's interest to press ahead with Brexit negotiations

Delaying Brexit negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about direction of its future

The extraordinary outcome of the general election and the uncertain domestic political climate has led to calls by Scottish first minister for a “short pause” in the Brexit process. Despite this, Brexit negotiations are now scheduled to begin on June 19.

There are no advantages for the in delaying or pausing negotiations. It is ready and waiting to negotiate an orderly British withdrawal – and keen to press ahead to limit the uncertainty caused by

Delaying the negotiation process would only prolong uncertainty about the direction of Meanwhile, the is eager to address other challenges such as the or an increasingly unpredictable environment. A pause would also increase legal uncertainty: there is no agreement on whether it is legally possible to stop the Article 50 process, so the Court of Justice of the EU might have to intervene.

The UK’s negotiating position outlined before the election appears under pressure as the prime minister, Theresa May, no longer has a parliamentary majority to sustain it. The outcome of the election has increased the influence of those within the Conservative Party, such as leader of the Conservatives in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, who favour membership of the single market, continuation of free movement and building cross-party consensus over the direction of

The expected controversial “supply and confidence” agreement with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has knocked May’s “no deal is better than a bad deal” mantra on the head. A solution to the Irish border issue – which requires a deal – has moved top of the agenda.

But until the government sits at the table and outlines its negotiating position, the is hostage to the partisan interests of the Conservative government. As Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator put it, talks should start when the “is ready”, but that: “I can’t negotiate with myself”.

After meeting British negotiators Olly Robbins and Tim Barrow on June 12, Barnier told journalists he needs a British delegation that “is stable, accountable and that has a mandate”.

Momentum with the EU

Once the triggered in March, beginning a two-year countdown to leaving the bloc, the balance of power tilted in favour of the EU, putting pressure on the

Despite the legal disagreement on whether can be withdrawn once triggered, and the Council’s negotiating guidelines do afford the flexibility tools to adapt to changes during the process. These include the possibility to extend the formal two-year negotiation period and to agree transitional arrangements.

The calculated deployment of these tools could help the limit future uncertainty. But it is not currently in the EU’s interest to either use this ability to extend the talks – or to press pause. Doing so would give the momentum back to the UK, and allow it to switch on and off the process at will – which goes against the spirit of the article itself.

The pressure of the two-year time frame on the British government is evident in reports of an EU threat to delay Brexit negotiations for a year if the UK insists on negotiating the terms of a new trade deal at the same time as its divorce proceedings from the bloc. Barnier’s mandate is to negotiate the UK’s withdrawal from the EU – not a future trade agreement. If the UK insists on negotiating an exit and a trade agreement in parallel, Barnier would need a new mandate from the European Council – and agreeing this might take a year. All the while, the Brexit clock continues ticking, and the time frame to negotiate a deal shortens.

Politically, the is in a strong position. The 27 member states have presented a solid, unified voice over The eurosceptic threat has weakened after pro-European Emmanuel Macron’s electoral success in and Angela Merkel’s expected re-election in September. The Eurozone’s economic performance has also recently improved. So it is to the EU’s advantage to harness this political capital and press on with the negotiations while it is in a strong position, rather than accommodating the needs of a weakened British government.

The Conversation logo

Under the current time frame, the deadline to reach a divorce deal is the end of March 2019. If there were to be a delay, elections, scheduled for May or June 2019, could potentially limit the length of any extension to just over two months so that the process would not overlap with the campaign and vote.

If a delay did mean negotiations overlapped or went beyond the 2019 elections, these are typically fought on national issues and the status of negotiations may well have some impact on voters’ choices. Of course, British MEPs standing in the election would be contesting an election to serve a shorter term.

There is no need for the to delay or press pause before the negotiations start. The has tools at its disposal to adapt to a changing environment now that the process has been set in motion. In the meantime, the clock is ticking and the pressure to get talking is felt more strongly in than in


Nieves Perez-Solorzano, Senior Lecturer in European Politics, University of Bristol

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

The Conversation

image
Business Standard
177 22