PM Modi against SC, ST creamy layer in reservations, says BJP MP Kulaste

Earlier, a Supreme Court seven-judge bench-led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud ruled that states are allowed to make further sub-classifications within SCs and STs for reservations

Modi, Narendra Modi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi speaks at the inauguration of the 32nd International Conference of Agricultural Economists, in New Delhi, Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024. (Photo: PTI)
Nisha Anand New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 09 2024 | 2:53 PM IST
On Friday, BJP MP Faggan Singh Kulaste said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is against the proposed sub-classification within the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
 
Kulaste was referring to the recent Supreme Court decision that a further sub-categorisation or the creamy layer criteria can be introduced within the SCs and STs to ensure quotas in government jobs and educational institutions for those groups, which are more marginalised within the community.

The term ‘creamy layer’ refers to the segment of the population that is excluded from benefits due to their relatively advanced socio-economic status compared to others.
 
“We told the PM that the SC decision on (identifying ) creamy layer from SCs/ STs (and their exclusion from reservation benefits) should not be implemented. The PM also said that this should not be implemented,” the BJP leader said after a meeting of several BJP MPs from SC/ST communities with PM Modi.

What SC ruled on introducing creamy layer within SCs and STs?

Last Thursday, a seven-judge bench of the top court led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud ruled in a 6:1 majority that states are allowed to make further sub-classifications.
 
Four of the six judges who agreed to the decision, wrote in their separate judgments, that the creamy layer must be excluded from the benefits of reservation. “In my view, only this and this alone can achieve the real equality as enshrined under the Constitution," Justice Gavai said in her 281-page judgement, concurring with the verdict.

What did the 2004 Chinnaiah judgement say?

The court’s verdict came after a review of the 2004 Chinnaiah judgement, which had refused a sub-categorisation in the matter, noting that SCs and STs are homogeneous groups, who have suffered marginalisation due to discrimination collectively as a group.
 
The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party is yet to release any nationally formulated statement or reaction to the verdict. Leaders from the Opposition’s INDIA bloc have also given mixed responses on the issue.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Narendra ModiReservation quotaSupreme CourtScheduled TribesScheduled CastesBS Web Reports

First Published: Aug 09 2024 | 2:53 PM IST

Next Story