In July 2022, Tata Group Chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran told the Financial Times that transition to green steelmaking hinged on the British government’s support. Talks had been going on for two years, and the writing was on the wall: Without a deal within the next 12 months, the plant, Port Talbot, would close down.
Port Talbot, Tata Steel’s upstream steelmaking facility in South Wales, had largely been a drag on the company’s bottom line since it acquired Anglo-Dutch steelmaker Corus in 2007. Government support was crucial as cash flows from the business fell short of funding the capital-intensive transition.
Cut to July 14, 2025. An impassioned Chandrasekaran, while flagging off the construction of the electric arc furnace (EAF) at the plant, spoke of the ups and downs the site had faced. “Many people, many naysayers probably thought that this day would not come. And that’s why it’s important,” he said. “We got a job in hand, we got to execute. We are super committed to this project. That’s why I wanted to be here today to show my personal and the Tata group’s commitment.”
The speech — brief — brimmed with optimism.
The EAF at Port Talbot brings the curtains down on carbon-intensive blast furnace (BF) steelmaking at the site and paves the way for low-carbon steel production.
The heavy-end assets were at the end of life and carbon costs on the blast furnace process were high. The transformation, however, impacts close to 2,500 jobs, even as it secures 5,000.
The BFs were decommissioned by the end of September 2024, a first on such a scale in the history of the company.
Last week, as construction of the EAF kicked off, the steelworkers’ union described it as a “bittersweet” day. While it looked at it as a consequence of the devastating closure of the blast furnaces, it also acknowledged that a future for Port Talbot steelmaking was now secured.
Getting to this point wasn’t easy. From securing union support to navigating government negotiations, it was a web of complex stakeholder management.
The transformation to low-carbon steelmaking involves an investment of £1.25 billion. The UK government is backing the project with £500 million — the funding came through after a stretch of political churn in Westminster.
When Tata Steel acquired Corus in a £6.2 billion deal in 2007, it gained two key steelmaking sites: Port Talbot and IJmuiden in the Netherlands. The latter has been largely self-sustaining, whereas the structurally weak UK operations demanded substantial capital.
Tata Steel disclosed in January 2024 that since the Corus acquisition, it had put in £6.8 billion in the UK towards improving steelmaking operations and processing sites, covering financial losses, pension restructuring costs, and providing additional capital support to service Tata Steel UK’s share of debt.
The closure of heavy-end assets at Port Talbot is expected to bring down the losses. The 3.2 million tonne (mt) EAF will be commissioned by the end of 2027. Downstream customers are currently being serviced with slabs from India, the Netherlands, and even the open market, reducing fixed cost.
The task before Tata Steel’s management is clear, and the goal firmly defined.
At its annual general meeting on July 2, Chandrasekaran told shareholders that the company was working towards becoming profit after tax (PAT)-positive. “Losses in the UK will be wiped out. And going forward, this year or the next, it will become PAT-positive,” he said.
The first step, however, could be to make it positive or neutral in terms of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation (Ebitda) this year. In FY25, UK Ebitda loss stood at £385 million.
In a credit rating report dated June, Icra noted: “Within the European operations, the UK assets were a weak link in terms of their cost position.” However, the EAF transformation will significantly improve the cost position of the UK asset and will, hence, arrest the drain in the company’s consolidated earnings, it said.
“The UK operations have cost Tata Steel a lot over the years — in terms of management bandwidth and financial capital,” said Tushar Chaudhuri, research analyst, PL Capital (Prabhudas Lilladher). “The leakage to earnings in the UK that impacted Tata Steel’s consolidated balance-sheet should now stop. And the Netherlands operations are expected to perform much better this year, post the relining of the blast furnace. Over the next two quarters, Tata Steel’s European operations should be Ebitda-positive.” Dutch support
In the UK, Tata Steel is already on the road to decarbonisation. In the Netherlands, the plans are still in motion.
In the Netherlands, Tata Steel plans to cut 1,200 jobs in phases as part of this exercise. But the cost-cutting drive is not just limited to the high-cost European outposts.
Over the next 12 to 18 months, Tata Steel has set a cost takeout target of ₹11,500 crore across regions: India, the UK, and the Netherlands. In FY25, the cost takeout had stood at ₹6,600 crore versus FY24 levels across units.
Rising geopolitical tensions, volatile steel prices, and impending auction of legacy iron ore mines in 2030 are among the challenges that are largely beyond Tata Steel’s control. So it is focusing on what it can control — resetting its cost structure.
A sector expert pointed out: “Tata Steel may bid for the mines when they come up for renewal, but costs will go up. It needs to prepare for life beyond 2030.”
On the cost takeout, Amit Lahoti, senior research analyst — Institutional Equities at Emkay Global, however, said, “It is difficult to assess how much of the cost takeout will ultimately flow to the Ebitda. There are too many moving parts, such as steel prices and market conditions.”
The company will also benefit from the expanded 5 mt capacity at Kalinganagar, Odisha, adding to its top and bottom line – with some of the additional volumes flowing in FY26.
 "Port Talbot's green furnace marks end of costly firefighting for Tata Steel")
