You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

How IIFCL manages to stay afloat despite stress in infrastructure sector

Hybrid-annuity model, lending restrictions have helped the lender manage its books better

Jyoti Mukul  |  New Delhi 

Illustration by Ajay Mohanty

The government-owned (IIFCL) wrote off 16 accounts from its balance sheet last year. This was also the year when it reported its first loss, since inception in 2006, at Rs 11.56 billion. Though this might be a reflection of the financial stress in the infrastructure sector, the firm’s balance sheet is more an outcome of provisioning requirements than a distress.

The company has been able to shield itself from the lending slowdown by turning its focus to hybrid-annuity model (HAM) projects in the road sector from 2015. This was also the point when it started to do its own appraisals, instead of relying on lead banker’s appraisal, said a senior official on conditions of anonymity.

was created in 2006 to provide funds for long-gestation infrastructure projects more in conjunction with bank lending than as a pure play lender. Ironically, this helped the company stay afloat when banks and other government-owned financial institutions such as Power Finance Corporation and Rural Electricity Corporation are facing the heat due to high levels of non-performing assets. Others, such as IL&FS, have seen their business strategy of being financier and project executor fail.

According to the official, adherence to its covenant Scheme for Financing Viable Infrastructure Projects (SIFTI) helped the company, though one of its larger accounts - Jaiprakash Industries - has been its biggest concern. Under SIFTI, IIFCL’s total lending cannot exceed 20 per cent of the total project cost.

In case of takeout financing, direct lending should not exceed 10 per cent of the cost, and total lending, including take out financing, should not be more than 30 per cent of the total project cost. In addition, loan disbursements have to be in proportion to disbursements from banks and financial institutions. “SIFTI has been a huge blessing, and has prevented risky behaviour,” he said.


Explaining the loss during the last financial year, he said it was because of provisioning made for bad accounts. “We created buffers for future.”

ALSO READ: 1361 infrastructure projects face 20% cost escalation on delays

Besides the write-offs, where it had advanced over Rs 10 billion in debt, also adopted accelerated provisioning in 15 cases. This included Jaypee Infratech’s Yamuna Expressway, where it funded Rs 9 billion in June 2015. This was under its takeout finance scheme on request from an IDBI Bank-led consortium.

Though the project closure was achieved in 2012, IIFCL faced flak from the Comptroller and Auditor General for extending the loan despite a National Green Tribunal order that curtailed construction in the area due to its proximity to the Okhla Bird Sanctuary.

IIFCL, however, is not too worried about the Jaypee account, since it has good assets like land and toll on the highway. It had also made provision of 40 per cent amounting to Rs 3.6 billion as of March 31, 2018. But after the February 12 circular of the Reserve Bank of India, it increased the provisioning up to 50 per cent in NCLT cases. So, it further made a provision of 10 per cent in loan account of Jaypee Infratech of Rs 900 million. The other accounts where provisioning was increased included Dighi Port, developed by Balaji Infra Projects, Tirupathi Tiruthani Chennai Tollways Private Limited and Lanco Teesta Hydro Power.

With the focus now turning to HAM projects, the ticket size of loans has reduced. But, the share of IIFCL’s debt in total projects has increased. “IIFCL is the go-to place for HAM projects,” added the official.

The government grant in HAM is up to 40 per cent, and another 12 per cent comes as promoter equity. Since IIFCL funds up to 20 per cent of the project cost, it can take up nearly half of the debt which is 48 per cent of the project cost, he explained.

“Though public private partnership projects have tried up, we now have smaller bets distributed across a larger number of players and, therefore, the risk is lower.”

As on March 31, 2018, IIFCL’s debt to 27 HAM projects is more than Rs 40 billion. Its overall sanctions stood at Rs 810 billion, of which the cumulative disbursements are Rs 601 billion, including refinance of Rs 72.31 billion and takeout finance of Rs 154 billion.

First Published: Fri, November 23 2018. 11:46 IST