IndiGo promoter dispute: Gangwal limited financial risks, says Bhatia camp
Rahul Bhatia claims he has played more significant role and undertaken financial risks
)
premium
Representative image
IndiGo promoter Rahul Bhatia has hit back at co-promoter Rakesh Gangwal’s demand for more control, saying that he has played a more significant role and undertaken financial risks while Gangwal limited his own.
This arrangement, Bhatia’s InterGlobe Enterprises (IGE) says, is the primary reason why it has more controlling rights in the company.
The support included personal guarantees from Bhatia and his father, Kapil Bhatia, of more than Rs 1,100 crore during the initial years of the company.
Bhatia has said its businesses had supported the airline in its fledgling years through its pan Indian sales and distribution network, call centres and IT services, and office space, some of which was also provided on a complimentary basis.
Bhatia and Gangwal founded IndiGo in 2005 and it now commands almost half of India’s domestic market. Each holds around 37 per cent in the company. “Right from the inception, the arrangement between the IGE Group and Mr Gangwal was transparent.
While each was to hold about equal ownership, the IGE Group was to take the financial risk. He had been a professional manager his entire life whilst the IGE Group had entrepreneurial DNA with a different view of and approach to risk,” IGE said.
This arrangement, Bhatia’s InterGlobe Enterprises (IGE) says, is the primary reason why it has more controlling rights in the company.
The support included personal guarantees from Bhatia and his father, Kapil Bhatia, of more than Rs 1,100 crore during the initial years of the company.
Bhatia has said its businesses had supported the airline in its fledgling years through its pan Indian sales and distribution network, call centres and IT services, and office space, some of which was also provided on a complimentary basis.
Bhatia and Gangwal founded IndiGo in 2005 and it now commands almost half of India’s domestic market. Each holds around 37 per cent in the company. “Right from the inception, the arrangement between the IGE Group and Mr Gangwal was transparent.
While each was to hold about equal ownership, the IGE Group was to take the financial risk. He had been a professional manager his entire life whilst the IGE Group had entrepreneurial DNA with a different view of and approach to risk,” IGE said.
Rahul Bhatia