You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

RInfra wins big, SC upholds Rs 5,000 cr arbitral award against Delhi Metro

Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the 2017 arbitration award in favour of Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt Ltd

Topics
Supreme Court | RInfra | DMRC

Megha Manchanda  |  New Delhi 

Photo: Bloomberg
Photo: Bloomberg

The (SC) on Thursday allowed a special leave petition filed by Delhi Airport Metro Express (DAMEPL), challenging the judgment of the Delhi High Court (HC) that had set aside the arbitral award to be paid by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC).

DAMEPL, a special purpose vehicle floated by Reliance Infrastructure, had won the Rs 2,800-crore award in 2017. "Along with interest and other costs, the amount would be over Rs 5,000 crore. would now have to pay the amount to the Anil Ambani group company," said a government official who did not want to be quoted.

"The victory comes at a good time for Anil Ambani, who is now in bankruptcy, and the money could be used to pay off loans owed to Reliance ADA Group," said Sonam Chandwani, managing partner at KS Legal & Associates. RInfra's consolidated debt was Rs 14,260 crore; its standalone debt Rs 3,808 crore as of March. Recently, it raised Rs 550 crore from promoter group and VSFI Holding Pte – an affiliate of Värde Investment Partners, LLP.

The apex court also dismissed a plea by contesting an order of a Delhi High Court division bench on issues of grant of interest and waiver of the termination notice due to DAMEPL’s conduct of operating the project for more than five months.

DAMEPL signed a contract with in 2008 to operate the country's first private city rail project until 2038.

“The (arbitration) tribunal awarded interest in accordance with the terms of the Concession Agreement on termination payment. DMRC contended before the High Court that the award in respect of interest had to be set aside on the ground that it would result in unjust enrichment. After a thorough consideration of Article 29.8 and Article 36.2.6.1 of the Concession Agreement, the High Court has rightly refused to interfere with the findings by the Tribunal relating to interest and we see no cause for interference,” the said in its order. This formed the basis of allowing appeal and setting aside the order of the division bench of the high court.

Following disagreements over fee and operations in 2012, ceased operations of the Capital's airport Metro project and filed an arbitration complaint against DMRC, alleging contract violations and sought a termination fee.

The apex court also issued a notice to DMRC on the Airport Express' plea for interim to continue servicing the debt of the SPV, pending the SC's disposal of the petition.

The SPV borrowed over Rs 1,600 crore from 11 banks, including Axis Bank, UCO Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, Andhra Bank, and Central Bank of India. The amount, including interest, has touched Rs 5,000 crore.

The Delhi HC in March 2018 asked DMRC to service all debt liabilities of the SPV and make necessary payments to banks to avoid the account from turning into a non-performing asset.

The SPV moved the apex court after a division Bench of the Delhi HC set aside an order of a single judge Bench, upholding the arbitral award in favour of the Delhi Airport Express.

DAMEPL was awarded the execution of a 22.7-kilometre high-speed Metro rail line in 2008.

It was decided to develop the project by engaging a concessionaire for financing, design, procurement, and installation of all systems (including but not limited to rolling stock, overhead electrification, track, signalling and telecommunication, ventilation and air conditioning, automatic fare collection, baggage check-in and handling, depot, and other facilities).

DMRC had to undertake the design and construction of the basic civil structure for the project, which was in the nature of a public-private partnership.

The SPV in 2012 left the contract, stating the operations of the express line were not viable on account of defects in the civil structures constructed by DMRC.

The case hearings went on for four years, after which the arbitral tribunal, in May 2017, ruled in favour of DAMEPL.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, September 09 2021. 19:16 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.