Standard Chartered Whistle-blower says US missed billions in Standard Chartered’s transactions with Iran were worth tens of billions of dollars more than previously known, a whistle-blower said in a lawsuit claiming the British bank actively pursued Iranian business in violation of US sanctions.
The bank executive, who isn’t named in court papers, was the bank’s global head of transaction banking and foreign exchange sales. He and another plaintiff -- described in the complaint only as an American currency trader -- say Standard Chartered handled more than $56 billion in transactions from 2009 to 2014, compared with $240 million cited by the Justice Department between 2007 and 2011 in an April settlement with the bank.
The transactions enabled Iran to aid U.S. adversaries. “Beneath the green eye-shade complexity and deception of the international financial transactions involved in this case, the unavoidable fact is that [Standard Chartered] used its resources to help terrorists kill and wound American, British, and other Coalition military personnel and thousands of innocent civilians,” the plaintiffs say in a complaint filed Thursday in Manhattan federal court.
The bank dismissed the lawsuit as “baseless,” noting that the US chose not to join the whistle-blower lawsuit.
“The U.S. authorities have been aware of these claims for several years and have not seen fit to join this suit or include the claims as part of our resolution of historical sanctions compliance issues,” it said in a statement.
StanChart has long battled allegations of illegal business with Iran, agreeing to pay a total of more than $1.7 billion in penalties after being prosecuted in 2012 and again in 2019 by the Justice Department and state and federal regulators. Standard Chartered’s 2012 settlement with the U.S. covered $250 billion in Iranian transactions over the years from 2001 to 2007, but the whistle-blower says the true number was closer to $280 billion.
The lawsuit opens a window on a seven-year saga in which the StanChart executive secretly aided U.S. prosecutors and regulators.
Just a week after the first settlements between the bank and U.S. authorities in 2012, the executives filed a sealed whistle-blower case and met with authorities to help develop their investigation, according to the complaint.
The FBI and Justice Department asked one of them to get more internal bank information from a source in Dubai, a key locus of the bank’s Iran operations. Two data sticks containing 79 files detailing thousands more illegal transactions were turned over to the FBI, according to the complaint. The whistle-blower’s lawsuit was dismissed in 2017 and refiled last year, and was unsealed only this month.
The plaintiffs brought the case through a holding company called Brutus Trading.
The prior U.S. enforcement cases focused on Standard Chartered’s method of “stripping” identifying Iranian information from payment messages. The suit claims the bank used other methods to process –- and hide -– Iranian business. Iranian clients were allowed to conduct transactions through a currency trading platform that was designed not to maintain records of illegal transactions, Iranian transactions were parked in so-called sundry accounts where they would remain undetected, and Iranian accounts were placed under another business unit to conceal their existence, according to the complaint.
The plaintiffs also claim StanChart’s pursuit of Iran business was “no haphazard affair.” Instead, it involved senior bank executives who actively sought to recruit clients blocked from the U.S. financial system, an effort dubbed “Project Green.” Among them were the National Iranian Oil Company and National Iranian Tanker Company, as well as several banks and a unit of Mahan Air, an Iranian airline the U.S. suspects of aiding the country’s ballistic missile system.
“Project Green was designed to assist, conspire, aid and abet non-United States customers that have been made the subject of United States economic sanctions to evade those sanctions and engage in international financial transactions,” according to the complaint.
A Justice Department spokesman didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
The case is Brutus Trading v. Standard Chartered Bank, 18-cv-11117, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).