Audit firms are seeking a rethink of new guidelines that require them to vet each whistle-blower complaint and issue assessments on a company’s financials.
According to people in the know, auditors have approached the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the National Financial Reporting Authority, seeking relaxation. They believe some aspects of the disclosure norms require tweaking and fine-tuning.
These new disclosure and assessment norms are a part of the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO), effective from the current financial year, where auditors are required to report more extensively on many crucial aspects, including frauds, loan defaults, whistle-blower complaints, and benami properties.
According to the auditors, most whistle-blower complaints received by companies are unsubstantiated, frivolous, and anonymous, which even companies are reluctant to share. Further, there has to be segregation in the analysis of complaints and they should be restricted to financial frauds. According to the new provision, the auditor is supposed to verify each complaint received by the company and confirm it.
“The recent reporting requirements under the auditor report have greatly expanded the scope of scrutiny of auditors, particularly in respect of reporting of whistle-blower complaints. There is an overlap between the function of an auditor and a company secretary, considering an analysis of a whistle-blower complaint would have substantial secretarial analysis, which the auditor may not be fully equipped to process,” said Atul Pandey, partner, Khaitan & Co.
Under the new rules, auditors are required to comment on 50 such matters in their audit reports, against the earlier 21, which, according to them, puts pressure on those under scrutiny due to various corporate governance lapses. Further, the new rules put the entire onus on the auditor, who largely relies on the information provided by the company.
According to people in the know, auditors have approached the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the National Financial Reporting Authority, seeking relaxation. They believe some aspects of the disclosure norms require tweaking and fine-tuning.
These new disclosure and assessment norms are a part of the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO), effective from the current financial year, where auditors are required to report more extensively on many crucial aspects, including frauds, loan defaults, whistle-blower complaints, and benami properties.
According to the auditors, most whistle-blower complaints received by companies are unsubstantiated, frivolous, and anonymous, which even companies are reluctant to share. Further, there has to be segregation in the analysis of complaints and they should be restricted to financial frauds. According to the new provision, the auditor is supposed to verify each complaint received by the company and confirm it.
“The recent reporting requirements under the auditor report have greatly expanded the scope of scrutiny of auditors, particularly in respect of reporting of whistle-blower complaints. There is an overlap between the function of an auditor and a company secretary, considering an analysis of a whistle-blower complaint would have substantial secretarial analysis, which the auditor may not be fully equipped to process,” said Atul Pandey, partner, Khaitan & Co.
Under the new rules, auditors are required to comment on 50 such matters in their audit reports, against the earlier 21, which, according to them, puts pressure on those under scrutiny due to various corporate governance lapses. Further, the new rules put the entire onus on the auditor, who largely relies on the information provided by the company.

)