You are here: Home » News-ANI » National
Business Standard

Will topple govt if Ram temple construction is opposed: Swamy

ANI  |  New Delhi [India] 

(BJP) has warned that if the Centre or government tries to oppose the construction of a in Ayodhya, he would "topple the government."

"If our matter (Ram temple) is listed in January, we'll win it in two weeks. Because my two opposing parties are the central government and government. Do they have the guts to oppose me? If they do, I'll topple the government. Though I know that they won't do it," he said while addressing a gathering at the (JNU) here on Friday.

Furthermore, Swamy claimed that the Muslims known to him had no objection in the construction of a in "The Muslims I meet personally tell me that they will not have any objection on the construction of in Ayodhya," he asserted.

Explaining the timeline of the case, Swamy noted: "filed a case claiming that the land that was captured by Mughal ruler Babar is ours. They never said that they want to re-construct Babri. They just said it's our title. Hindu parties like Vyas and said that there were two temples of which they were trustees, and should be given to them. The heard their suit and said it's Ram Janmbhoomi, two gumbads will go to Hindus, one to Muslims."

Further substantiating his stance and giving a chronological order to the incidents, he added: "challenged it because the land was given to Muslims and not them. The matter was then not heard from 2010-2017. I went to the Supreme Court, and that is why the date was not being fixed by the court. First, they ousted me asking what my stake is (in the matter)"

Elaborating upon how he further went about the case, Swamy claimed that his right to pray should be considered above a property right.

"I have the right to pray according to the constitution. Court agreed to hear. My faith says that Ram was born here and I want a huge temple there. Muslims are only asking for property, which is not a fundamental right. I appeal to the to put my fundamental right above their normal property rights and accept my petition," said the BJP

Adding weight age to his remark, Swamy claimed that the Archaeological Survey of (ASI) stated that there was a temple on the disputed land of

"ASI has given a report that states there that was a temple at the land and also said that the temple should be constructed. However, said the 1994 judgement is old and a 7-judge bench should be constituted to take a decision. The judgement came in November that there is no need of the bench, so half of my work is completed."

The Babri Masjid, built by Mughal in 1578 in Ayodhya, was, on December 6, 1992, pulled down allegedly by a group of Hindu activists, claiming that the mosque was constructed after demolishing a Since then, several hearings have been held in the top court to resolve the issue.

The in October adjourned the title suit till January 2019 to fix the date of hearing in the matter.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sat, December 08 2018. 07:53 IST