It is stated that rationale behind minimum public shareholding requirement is to provide liquidity to the investors and to discover fair prices — the larger the public float, the less is the scope for price manipulation. However, what is misunderstood is that larger public holding in terms of percentage doesn’t reflect a healthy public float until and unless large numbers of shares are held by the public. In order to curb price manipulation and ensure liquidity, a number of shares are necessary to be distributed to a large number of shareholders.
In an entity with a significant public interest like a listed company, a minimum 25 per cent holding by the non-promoter group becomes mandatory to protect the interest of minor shareholders and avoid possible mismanagement. But such a provision in government companies can easily be done away with. Even though discrimination between government and non-government companies prima facie does look unfair, considering the larger interest at stake, a few rationale discrimination can be acceptable.
Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
Fax: (011) 23720201 • E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number