You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Creamy layer concept not applicable in SC/ST quota: Centre to SC

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Centre today ruled out in the Supreme Court the possibility of excluding the creamy layer from among Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes from getting quota benefits, saying the entire community is "backward".

The top court was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Samta Andolan Samiti seeking exclusion of affluent SC and STs members from availing the quota benefits on the ground that they did not need reservation and it led to deprivation of benefits to those needy among these communities.

"There cannot be any creamy layer concept for SCs and STs," Additional Solicitor General P S Narasimha, appearing for the Centre, submitted before a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra.

The law officer told the bench, that also comprised Justice A M Khanwilkar, that the entire schedule castes and tribes were "so backward" that the creamy layer concept, applicable in the case of Other Backward Classes quota, cannot be made applicable for the SCs and STs.

Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the NGO, said due to non-application of "creamy layer exclusion principle", the deserving and the needy members of SC/ST communities are deprived of the reservation benefits. He also said the issue has been raised only by the members of the SC/ST community.

The bench asked the Centre to file an affidavit in response to the petition within four weeks and fixed the PIL for final disposal in the second week of July.

The plea has contended that benefits of reservation and other government schemes given to the SCs and STs were not reaching the actual beneficiaries due to the creamy layer among these communities which were taking away the quota benefits.

"The benefits of reservation policy are not percolating down to the people who are in actual need of the same and the practice of including the members of the creamy layers of the said communities has resulted in abuse by the advanced and affluent members of the said communities," it said.

It claimed that the affluent sections were "snatching" away the maximum benefit and 95 per cent of these communities were at a disadvantageous position, bereft of any benefit.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Wed, March 28 2018. 18:52 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU