Page 4 - Johnson And Johnson

Johnson & Johnson wins 4th verdict in a row, cleared in US baby powder case

The baby powder of Johnson & Johnson is not responsible for a Missouri woman's cancer, a jury in the US has decided in the company's latest win in a litigation case over its famous product. The litigation case (Forrest) in St Louis, Missouri in the US has resulted in a verdict for Johnson & Johnson, finding Johnson's baby powder was not the cause of the Vickie Forrest's disease. "This is the fourth consecutive verdict in favour of Johnson & Johnson in these cases and the eighth defense verdict this year," a Johnson & Johnson company spokesperson said in a statement. The jury carefully considered the decades of independent clinical evidence, which show Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer, it added. "We know that anyone suffering from cancer is searching for answers, which is why the science and facts on this topic are so important," the statement said.

Drug inspectors seize J&J baby product samples from wholesalers, retailers

The CDSCO, under the Union Health Ministry, said a team of 100 drug inspectors have been deployed for this purpose

J&J faulty hip implant compensation: Age, risk factor may be considered

Based on the slabs, the amount could vary from Rs 3 million to as much as Rs 12 million

Faulty hip implants: Govt's nod soon for compensation formula on J&J

The company said it had reached out to doctors to let patients know of the compensation programme

Redress for faulty Johnson & Johnson hip implant surgeries unlikely

Experts claim law does not make compensation compulsory