Arunachalam moves NCLT over denial of board seat; next hearing on April 23
The main allegation is that there has been a history of gender discrimination in the Murugappa Group
)
premium
Valli Arunachalam
Valli Arunachalam, the eldest daughter of former Murugappa group executive chairman M V Murugappan, and her family have moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, seeking waiver of the minimum shareholding requirement of 10 per cent to maintain the alleged oppression and mismanagement case against Ambadi Investments (AIL), the flagship company of the Rs 38,000-crore group.
The NCLT has given the respondents three weeks’ time to reply and posted the matter for April 23.
Senior Counsel P S Raman, who appeared for Arunachalam, argued that the family owns 8.21 per cent in AIL and falls short of the minimum requirement by 1.79 per cent, according to section 241 of the Companies Act 2013.
He pointed out that the NCLT, New Delhi, had given a waiver to certain firms of Cyrus Mistry from the minimum requirement for maintaining a case against Tata Sons.
The main allegation is that there has been a history of gender discrimination in the Murugappa Group. Raman said the plea for equal representation in company affairs had been denied since her father’s death a few years back.
“Murugappan is the only family member who does not have a male legal heir. We are making a very serious allegation of gender discrimination. When Valli Arunachalam’s name was proposed to the board, the reply was that she was not qualified,” Raman argued on Wednesday. He pointed out the main petition also seeks a fair buyout of their stake as per section 242 (2b) of the Companies Act 2013.
The NCLT has given the respondents three weeks’ time to reply and posted the matter for April 23.
Senior Counsel P S Raman, who appeared for Arunachalam, argued that the family owns 8.21 per cent in AIL and falls short of the minimum requirement by 1.79 per cent, according to section 241 of the Companies Act 2013.
He pointed out that the NCLT, New Delhi, had given a waiver to certain firms of Cyrus Mistry from the minimum requirement for maintaining a case against Tata Sons.
The main allegation is that there has been a history of gender discrimination in the Murugappa Group. Raman said the plea for equal representation in company affairs had been denied since her father’s death a few years back.
“Murugappan is the only family member who does not have a male legal heir. We are making a very serious allegation of gender discrimination. When Valli Arunachalam’s name was proposed to the board, the reply was that she was not qualified,” Raman argued on Wednesday. He pointed out the main petition also seeks a fair buyout of their stake as per section 242 (2b) of the Companies Act 2013.
Topics : Murugappa Group NCLT