Bajaj Finserv reports flat net profit growth in Q1; total income rises 40%
Total Income grew by 40 per cent year-on-year, though profitability of life and general insurances business dragged the overall show
)
premium
Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Bajaj Finserv — the holding company of Bajaj Finance, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company (BAGIC), and Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company (BALIC) — on Thursday reported a 40 per cent year-on-year increase in income to Rs 12,272 crore in the June quarter (Q1).
The company’s net profit at Rs 845 crore, however, increased by only 2 per cent year on year as a few one-offs provisioning expenses in BAGIC and BALIC impacted the overall numbers. Bajaj Finserv’s stock shed 3.9 per cent on Thursday to close at Rs 6,783 apiece on the BSE.
BAGIC’s underwriting result was affected by losses from cyclone Fani, which hit India’s east coast during the June quarter. The life and general insurance businesses were also hit by impairment costs on account of default by Dewan Housing Finance (DHFL) on a part of commercial paper dues.
Therefore, while BAGIC and BALIC recorded premium growth of 17 per cent and 35 per cent to Rs 2,843 crore and Rs 1,837 crore, respectively, their profits were adversely impacted by provision for impairment on their holdings of DHFL’s fixed income securities.
The company’s net profit at Rs 845 crore, however, increased by only 2 per cent year on year as a few one-offs provisioning expenses in BAGIC and BALIC impacted the overall numbers. Bajaj Finserv’s stock shed 3.9 per cent on Thursday to close at Rs 6,783 apiece on the BSE.
BAGIC’s underwriting result was affected by losses from cyclone Fani, which hit India’s east coast during the June quarter. The life and general insurance businesses were also hit by impairment costs on account of default by Dewan Housing Finance (DHFL) on a part of commercial paper dues.
Therefore, while BAGIC and BALIC recorded premium growth of 17 per cent and 35 per cent to Rs 2,843 crore and Rs 1,837 crore, respectively, their profits were adversely impacted by provision for impairment on their holdings of DHFL’s fixed income securities.