You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

Bombay HC directs UTI AMC to include staff liabilities in IPO prospectus

The liabilities could amount to Rs 1,250 crore, with bulk arising out of pension dues to 1,200-odd former employees, as per estimates by staff associations

UTI AMC | Bombay High Court | IPO

Ashley Coutinho  |  Mumbai 

The erstwhile UTI had offered a Voluntary Retirement Scheme in 2003 for employees completing 10 years of service

The (HC) has directed UTI Asset Management Company (AMC) to include the quantum of contingent liabilities arising because of pension and other dues related to its former and serving officers in its red herring prospectus (RHP) before it hits the market for an initial public offering (IPO).

In July, the UTI Retired and VSS Employees Social Association (UTIRAVESA), along with the Officers' Association, filed a writ petition before the HC claiming that the draft RHP of the asset manager’s failed to adequately highlight the contingent liabilities arising out of employee-related dues. The petition has now been withdrawn on assurance from the AMC that it will include such liabilities in the RHP.

The liabilities could amount to Rs 1,250 crore, with the bulk of it arising out of pension dues to around 1,200 former employees, according to the UTIRAVESA's and the Officers' Association's estimates. UTI AMC, however, maintained that the liabilities were not quantifiable at this stage.

"There is no change in the amount of contingent liability included in the financial statements included in the offer document. Our company has agreed, without prejudice to the rights of the company, to record the allegation of the petitioner on the amount involved in certain ongoing litigation along with the statement that such allegations are disputed by the company and are not quantifiable at this stage. The disputes in relation to the claims by the petitioners are sub judice at this stage," clarified in an email.

A few months back, the central government filed an affidavit, saying it was not a party to the ongoing pension dispute of former UTI employees. This could put the onus on the AMC to pay the employee dues.

ALSO READ: eSIM fraud: Don't respond to fraudsters' blandishments or threats

"The AMC has agreed to disclose the allegation and along with the fact that it disputes the allegation. The demand for the third pension does not exist today and the question of liability will arise only when it gets activated," said a person with the knowledge of the development.


In January 2019, the ministry of finance, through the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management, had asked to address pending grievances and ensure entitlements of the officers of the erstwhile UTI are protected under Section 6 (1) of the UTI Repeal Act 2002.

ALSO READ: ONGC June quarter profit dives 92% as oil, gas price slump to decade low

"The management of has delayed the implementation of the decision of this critical report to suppress the huge liability arising out of the settlement of long-pending issues, and to camouflage and present a better financial statement before the to prospective investors, which is unfair and misleading… the management and the board of UTI AMC are in a hurry to push the at a high price, suppressing large liabilities,” a letter sent to Sebi by the All India UTI AMC Officers’ Association a few months back had observed.

The information on employee-related dues and liabilities has to be disclosed in the prospectus to ensure investors do a fair evaluation of the IPO pricing, said a person, who is part of the retired association. He added payouts arising out of these liabilities could impact the AMC’s balance sheet.

According to Unit Trust of India Pension Regulations, 1994, the pension will be payable to all full-time and part-time employees (exceeding 13 hours per week) who have completed 10 years of service.

The UTIRAVESA had earlier filed two writ petitions before the HC, demanding the opportunity to exercise options to avail of pension. The Officers' Association had also filed a writ petition in the court to restore the retirement age of officers to 60 years, in line with that of workmen staff and employees in the RBI/IDBI and public sector banks. Another writ petition was filed for restoration of sick leave and other leave facilities.

The erstwhile UTI had offered a Voluntary Retirement Scheme in 2003 for employees completing 10 years of service. It had constituted a staff welfare fund, which became part of Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India, or Suuti, after the former split into two entities.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Tue, September 01 2020. 14:44 IST