Flagging concerns on its limited ability to police state-run lenders, which have recently seen a slew of scams, the Reserve Bank on Thursday sought amendments to the Banking Regulation (BR) Act "to correct the legal asymmetry".
RBI Governor Urjit Patel, who had recently gone public with the legal limitations faced by the central bank in regulating state-owned lenders in the light of over Rs 130-billion scam at PNB, reiterated that there is an "asymmetry" in its powers between government and private banks.
"The Governor has said the non-neutrality of RBI's powers comes from the provisions of the BR Act. That needs to be changed. The Governor has made the bank's position on this very clear."
These comments were made by both the officials at the customary post-monetary-policy-review press conference. RBI kept its key lending rate unchanged at 6 per cent, citing inflation concerns.
It was first time since the biggest scam in the nation's banking history in mid-February that the RBI has taken questions from the media.
Delivering a speech in Gujarat's capital Gandhinagar, Patel had recently made a strong case for banking regulatory powers of the RBI to be "ownership neutral", and had cited several statutes which prevent it from moving against the state-owned banks in the same way as their private sector rivals.
In the comments, which had come amid rising criticism of the central bank for not being able to detect the PNB fraud, Patel had said RBI faced limitations like inabilities to remove directors or management, supersede the board, force a merger, or remove the chairman and managing director or even revoke the licence of a state-run bank.
There are 21 state-run banks and the condition of over a dozen of them are a part of the prompt corrective action framework, wherein a huge pile-up of bad assets have resulted in RBI imposing restrictions on normal operations.