You are here: Home » International » News » Companies
Business Standard

Tesla investor files suit against Elon Musk over 'toxic' work culture

A Tesla Inc. investor accused the electric-vehicle maker's officers and directors in a lawsuit of allowing a "toxic workplace culture" to fester at the company

Topics
Tesla | Elon Musk | Lawsuits

Malathi Nayak | Bloomberg 

Elon Musk. Photo: Bloomberg
Elon Musk. Photo: Bloomberg

A Inc. investor accused the electric-vehicle maker’s officers and directors in a lawsuit of allowing a “toxic workplace culture” to fester at the company.

Chief Executive Officer and others who run the world’s largest electric-vehicle maker breached their fiduciary duty by fostering an environment of discrimination and harassment, exposing to millions of dollars in potential liability, according to the complaint filed Thursday by stockholder Solomon Chau in federal court in Austin, Texas.

“This toxic work environment has gestated internally for years, and only recently has the truth about Tesla’s culture emerged, leading to legal action from government regulators and private parties alike,” Chau said in the complaint. “Tesla’s toxic workplace culture has caused financial harm and irreparable damage to the company’s reputation.”

is fighting a suit by California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing over racial discrimination and harassment, after the agency found a widespread pattern of mistreatment of Black workers at the electric car-maker’s factory near San Francisco. The company also faces complaints from several female employees that sexual harassment is rampant at the Fremont factory.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. It said in a blog post in February that the DFEH complaint is “misguided.”

Musk “either knew, was reckless, or was grossly negligent in disregarding the illegal activity of such substantial magnitude and duration,” Chau claimed in his complaint.

Chau faulted the company’s board for the defeat of shareholder proposals aimed at addressing workplace issues at Tesla.

Shareholder activists haven’t been successful so far in pushing Tesla’s board to adopt more transparency about its use of arbitration to resolve complaints about sexual harassment and racial discrimination.

The case is Chau v. Musk, 1:22-cv-00592, US District Court, Western District of Texas (Austin).

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Fri, June 17 2022. 08:46 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.