You are here: Home » News-IANS » Business-Economy
Business Standard

Role of litigators in Indiabulls case suspect (IANS Special)

IANS  |  New Delhi 

With charges of misappropriation swirling in the air, Housing Finance share price took a beating on Tuesday, closing at Rs 674.15, down Rs 59.20 (8.07 per cent). The company's and directors have been accused of allegedly misappropriating Rs 98,000 crore of public money and, as always, shareholder wealth has taken a knock. hit back terming these allegations as a desperate attempt to "malign" the company's reputation and create hurdles in its merger with

The stock opened at a loss of 4.51% at 700 level on BSE. The stock has lost 43.71% during the last one year and fallen 20.73% since the beginning of this year. The large cap stock underperformed the sector by over 8%. On Tuesday, Kislay Panday, a sought protection for the petitioners and saying the complaints lodged under Whistle Blowers' Protection Act-2014 are to be dealt under section 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16 and not as per the dictates or suggestions by the accused persons as how the complainants against them are to be dealt with.

On Monday, a plea was filed in the seeking legal action against Housing Finance Limited (IHFL), its and directors for alleged misappropriation of Rs 98,000 crore of public money. The petition alleged that money worth thousands of crores were siphoned off by Sameer Gehlaut, the of the firm, and the directors of Indiabulls for their personal use.

Abhay Yadav, the petitioner and one of the IHFL shareholders, alleged that Gehlaut, with the help of one -- an NRI based in -- allegedly created multiple "shell companies" to which IHFL loaned huge sums of money under "bogus and non-existent pretexts".

This plea came on the back of a case in the In late May, dismissed a complaint alleging unfair and discriminatory trade practices by and several of its employees pertaining to loan agreement.

While dismissing the complaint, the fair trade regulator said it found no contravention of the Competition Act by Indiabulls Housing and its employees. The ruling came on a complaint filed by who had availed a loan facility of Rs 1 crore for which he entered into a loan agreement with Indiabulls Housing during June 2018.

The complainant alleged that the rate of interest was increased from 8.75 per cent to 11.15 per cent within four months and the period of loan was increased to 364 months from 240 months without taking any consent from him.

This points to some sort of conspiracy being hatched against Indiabulls if one examines the sequencing of rapidly moving events.

Yadav's contention was that the shell further transferred the loan amount to other which were either run, directed or operated by Gehlaut, his family members or other directors of Indiabulls, the plea alleged.

On Tuesday it emerged that who has filed the plea is indeed a shareholder of Indiabulls, but between 9.5.2019 and 7.6.2019, his total shareholding remains only 4 shares. This means that he became a shareholder just before the filing of the petition and is perhaps in a way role playing as a minority investor.

has issued a certificate validating this on Tuesday. Similarly the other litigator bought two shares on 14.122018 and as of 25.3.2019, he only held the same two shares according to from which IANS recovered this information.

"This entire chain of scam would have never been possible without the conniving with the auditors, credit rating agencies and officials concerned of the respective government departments," the plea said. The plea also sought directions to market regulator SEBI, Centre, and or the competent authority to restore, protect and conserve the defrauded and misappropriated investors' money.

However, in a clarification, Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd (IBHFL) said the writ petition filed in the is an attempt to "malign" the company's reputation and create hurdles in its merger with

"The writ petition is filed only today and is not heard by the court...The total loans on the books of Indiabulls Housing is approx Rs 90,000 crore. The allegations of siphoning off of Rs 98,000 crore is bizarre," IBHFL said on Monday.

--IANS

prs/

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, June 11 2019. 20:16 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU