Model code, productive use
The terribly elongated polling process, perhaps necessary to ensure free and fair elections in every part of India, means that almost a full quarter will be lost for policymaking
)
premium
Illustration by Binay Sinha
The government is now closed for business, or at least serious business, until the first week of June. After the announcement of the general election dates and the enforcement of the model code of conduct, no policy decision will be made until a new government assumes office. The terribly elongated polling process, perhaps necessary to ensure free and fair elections in every part of India, means that almost a full quarter will be lost for policymaking. At a time when the economy is still facing challenges on the growth front — industrial growth was just 1.7 per cent in January — precious time will be wasted.
However, that is the reality. Unfortunately, in a country which is in the election mode every year, such frequent periods of policy pause are costly. In principle, therefore, the PM’s call for simultaneous elections (or an alternative US-like system where there are two election cycles every four/five years) makes sense for an emerging economy that still needs continuous, uninterrupted policy change efforts. That said, is there a way the lull can be put to productive use? The answer is yes.
In the context of a general election, it is important to acknowledge that the actual time wasted in terms of policymaking may actually be more than three months. The fact is that the attention of the government in the quarter preceding the election announcement is usually focused on what may broadly be termed as populist measures. It is certainly not the time for challenging reforms. And often, post-election, the energies of a new government in the first three months is focused on personnel changes and planning an agenda for governance rather than on policy implementation.
However, that is the reality. Unfortunately, in a country which is in the election mode every year, such frequent periods of policy pause are costly. In principle, therefore, the PM’s call for simultaneous elections (or an alternative US-like system where there are two election cycles every four/five years) makes sense for an emerging economy that still needs continuous, uninterrupted policy change efforts. That said, is there a way the lull can be put to productive use? The answer is yes.
In the context of a general election, it is important to acknowledge that the actual time wasted in terms of policymaking may actually be more than three months. The fact is that the attention of the government in the quarter preceding the election announcement is usually focused on what may broadly be termed as populist measures. It is certainly not the time for challenging reforms. And often, post-election, the energies of a new government in the first three months is focused on personnel changes and planning an agenda for governance rather than on policy implementation.
Illustration by Binay Sinha
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper