I spoke to more than half a dozen of Virat Kohli’s endorsement brands over the last few days. Will you retain him, or will you be looking for alternatives, I asked? First reaction, universally, was we will “wait-and-watch”. So, me being me, I asked wait for what, and watch out for what? Then, one of them slowly opened up and said, “Now that he is no longer captain, maybe he will drop price.” Ahha! Another added, “We are thinking of commissioning research on whether he continues to be as popular as before.” Aawww! A third came up with a different perspective, “If he doesn’t keep his place in the side, we will have to let him go.” Oh, is that really a possibility, I asked? “Well, he’s gone without a century in 30 innings — if Ajinkya Rahane and Cheteshwar Pujara can be on the watch-list, why not him? Many in the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) don’t like him anyway.” Mm…mmm. Finally came the perspective that I was least prepared for. “Virat had started to believe he was above ordinary mortals. His handlers would keep you dangling for months for that one day of shooting he was committed to in the contract. To shoot with him was like trying to squeeze a truck into a parking space for a two-wheeler — he was over-committed to brands and there would be a constant queue to get his time and attention. And through all this his agents were rude, aloof and un-cooperative.” I wasn’t sure if that was really true. But at least that is the general impression going around.
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

)