Time to put the economy back on track
Reforms are necessary but the pace of their implementation should be regulated. Focus has to be on sectors that can create jobs
)
premium
The fact that the economy is facing troubled times has now been widely accepted. The gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate has touched a three-year low of 5.7 per cent in Q2 of 2017 as against 6.1 per cent in the previous period and market expectations of 6.6 per cent. Credit offtake in the non-food sector declined to a record low of 3.3 per cent in February 2017, the lowest in several decades, on a year to year basis as against an increase of 9.9 per cent in February 2016, according to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data. Credit to industry actually contracted in this period by 5.2 per cent, particularly credit flow to medium units, which declined by 12.2 per cent. While the Nikkei Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index showed an improvement to 51.2 per cent in August this year, the Services PMI remained low at 47.5 per cent. According to the Economic Survey, 2016-17, medium, small and micro industrial units are reported to have shown an alarming picture of declining investment and a high degree of closure. The phenomenon of jobless growth has been with us for some years now and this is likely to be accentuated by decline in the informal sector. In eight labour-intensive sectors, the Labour Bureau estimated that fresh job creation in 2015 was only 135,000 and in April to December 2016, it was barely 231,000, comparing unfavourably with 1.265 million jobs created in the fiscal year 2009.
The fact that the government has recognised this problem is a good sign for the economy. The word “stimulus”, which, for some reason, had become a bad word in the years after 2008-09, is now back in circulation. It is good to hear from Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that, as a proactive government, economic indicators are being analysed to take appropriate action.
Indeed, it has always been my view that the economy must be watched carefully at every turn and policy adjusted to meet its requirements from time to time. For some time now, we have been too focused on “holy cows” in the management of the economy — concepts like the fiscal deficit being sacrosanct, monetary policy being entirely inflation targeted and high degrees of regulatory action aimed ostensibly at black money and corruption. The economy has also been subjected to severe jolts from which it will take time to recover. Reforms are necessary and we must, indeed, look at the long term. However, the pace of reform must be modulated, taking into account the conditions prevailing in the national as well as global economy. Pragmatic corrective action should also be part of rational economic policy.
At this point of time, the requirement of the economy is obviously more investment, which will create more jobs and increase purchasing power that will sustain a high level of production. Official figures show that gross fixed capital formation in India as per cent of GDP fell from 34.6 per cent in 2011-12 to 29.3 per cent in 2015-16 and 26.6 per cent in 2016-17, which indicates a fall of about eight per cent. As there are no indications as yet of a sizeable improvement in private investment, there has to be much heavier public investment. Fiscal deficit limits are usually prescribed so that government borrowing activity does not crowd out private investment. When private investment is not sufficiently active, there is no alternative to substantial public investment, even if this leads to self-imposed fiscal deficit norms being breached. Big projects, like the Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail, involve heavy investment, establishment of subsidiary industries and creation of jobs and purchasing power. It would be desirable for the government to look seriously at the other five high-speed rail corridors mentioned in the 12th Five Year Plan document, as well as other high investment measures.
The fact that the government has recognised this problem is a good sign for the economy. The word “stimulus”, which, for some reason, had become a bad word in the years after 2008-09, is now back in circulation. It is good to hear from Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that, as a proactive government, economic indicators are being analysed to take appropriate action.
Indeed, it has always been my view that the economy must be watched carefully at every turn and policy adjusted to meet its requirements from time to time. For some time now, we have been too focused on “holy cows” in the management of the economy — concepts like the fiscal deficit being sacrosanct, monetary policy being entirely inflation targeted and high degrees of regulatory action aimed ostensibly at black money and corruption. The economy has also been subjected to severe jolts from which it will take time to recover. Reforms are necessary and we must, indeed, look at the long term. However, the pace of reform must be modulated, taking into account the conditions prevailing in the national as well as global economy. Pragmatic corrective action should also be part of rational economic policy.
At this point of time, the requirement of the economy is obviously more investment, which will create more jobs and increase purchasing power that will sustain a high level of production. Official figures show that gross fixed capital formation in India as per cent of GDP fell from 34.6 per cent in 2011-12 to 29.3 per cent in 2015-16 and 26.6 per cent in 2016-17, which indicates a fall of about eight per cent. As there are no indications as yet of a sizeable improvement in private investment, there has to be much heavier public investment. Fiscal deficit limits are usually prescribed so that government borrowing activity does not crowd out private investment. When private investment is not sufficiently active, there is no alternative to substantial public investment, even if this leads to self-imposed fiscal deficit norms being breached. Big projects, like the Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail, involve heavy investment, establishment of subsidiary industries and creation of jobs and purchasing power. It would be desirable for the government to look seriously at the other five high-speed rail corridors mentioned in the 12th Five Year Plan document, as well as other high investment measures.
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper