Thursday, December 11, 2025 | 12:53 PM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Trial court lawyers must be considered for senior designation by HCs: SC

The top court noted the high courts could always call for the views of the principal district judges or the heads of tribunals on such applicants

Lawyer, Supreme Court

The apex court, however, said the minimum qualification of 10 years of law practice fixed needed no reconsideration. | Image: Bloomberg

Press Trust of India New Delhi

Listen to This Article

Observing senior designation couldn't be a monopoly of selected few, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said lawyers practising in subordinate judiciary and other fora must be considered for designation as senior advocates.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan and S V N Bhatti said the process of designation must be objectively fair and guided and there is a need to have at least one exercise of designation conducted every year.

"When we talk of diversity, we must ensure that the high courts evolve a mechanism by which the members of the bar practising in our trial and district judiciary and before specialised tribunals are considered for designation as their role is no inferior to the role played by advocates practising before this court and high courts. This is also an essential part of diversity," it said.

 

The top court noted the high courts could always call for the views of the principal district judges or the heads of tribunals on such applicants.

"Moreover, when the cases of the advocates practising in district courts are considered, the views of the guardian/administrative judges of the district concerned are always available," it added.

The bench has issued a new set of guidelines for grant of senior designation to advocates as it did away with the existing point-based assessment by the top court and high courts.

The bench said its experience in the last seven-and-a-half years showed it might not be rationally or objectively possible to assess caliber standing at the bar and the legal experience of advocates applying for senior designations on the basis of points.

It asked the high courts to amend their existing rules in line with the new set of directions within four months.

The apex court, however, said the minimum qualification of 10 years of law practice fixed needed no reconsideration.

The top court further allowed the practice of advocates filing their applications for the grant of designation to continue as it indicated consent on their part.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: May 13 2025 | 9:49 PM IST

Explore News