The vaccine candidate is in phase 1/2a clinical trials
The baby powder of Johnson & Johnson is not responsible for a Missouri woman's cancer, a jury in the US has decided in the company's latest win in a litigation case over its famous product. The litigation case (Forrest) in St Louis, Missouri in the US has resulted in a verdict for Johnson & Johnson, finding Johnson's baby powder was not the cause of the Vickie Forrest's disease. "This is the fourth consecutive verdict in favour of Johnson & Johnson in these cases and the eighth defense verdict this year," a Johnson & Johnson company spokesperson said in a statement. The jury carefully considered the decades of independent clinical evidence, which show Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer, it added. "We know that anyone suffering from cancer is searching for answers, which is why the science and facts on this topic are so important," the statement said.
(Reuters) - Ever since Johnson & Johnson disclosed this month that a government test had turned up asbestos in its Baby Powder, the company has attacked the validity of the result.
Firm willing to pay RS 25 lakh only to 'revision surgery' patients, not others
(Reuters) - Healthcare conglomerate Johnson & Johnson has lost its motion to reverse a verdict that awarded $4.7 billion to women who blamed ovarian cancer on asbestos in the company's Baby Powder and other talc products, a Missouri court ruled on Wednesday.
The absence of compensation provisions in the Drugs & Cosmetics Act puts the spotlight on the gaps in the regulatory regime
Company executives, mine managers, scientists, doctors and lawyers fretted over the problem and how to address it while failing to disclose it to regulators or the public
The government wrote to J&J's subsidiary DePuy Medical, which made the devices, asking them to provide compensation till 2025
J&J's India bet comes at a time when it has faced consumer ire in the US