"It is within the domain of the Election Commission... if you don't want to be independent, (and remain) constrained by the legislature, (then) say so," said a bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Navin Sinha as counsel for the poll panel told the court it was supporting the cause of the petitioner to decriminalise politics.
"When a citizen comes to the EC seeking lifetime ban on convicted lawmakers, is silence an option? Either you can say 'yes' or 'no'. Can you afford to be silent?" the bench said as it read a paragraph from the response of the EC which supported the plea for lifetime ban on convicted lawmakers on contesting elections.
However, counsel told the bench that the said paragraph should not be read in isolation and should be read as a part of the entire response of the Commission.
"We are supporting the cause of the petitioner for decriminalisation of politics and there should be framework for decriminalisation of politics," counsel said, but the court retorted hat the EC wanted the court to read in between the lines, and there was no reason why they should do so.
The court's response came in the course of the hearing of a PIL by BJP leader Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay seeking lifetime ban on convicted lawmakers and setting up of special courts for trying lawmakers accused of criminal offences.
Earlier appearing for one of the interveners, senior counsel Siddharth Luthra said that the principal point is when a lawmaker is disqualified following his conviction, then can the disqualification be limited to a point of time.
The court directed further hearing on August 18.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)