Fixing implementation
Four decades of socialist economic functioning laid greater stress on job security than job performance

premium
With reference to “Three-page notes considered harmful” (October 16), policies, whether administrative, commercial or legal, should not only formulated but also implemented. Policy implementation calls for determination to overcome hurdles in its path. However, there is a large hierarchical system in all institutions with a clear demarcation of authority at various levels for decision-making. Failure in an aggressive approach at any level leads to disciplinary consequences for the one who takes a decision. Out of 10 aggressive strategies two may fail. However, the standard organisational notion is not that eight decisions were successful but why two have failed to fix accountability. Corrective measures should be undertaken to plug loopholes rather than to take punitive action. The absence of this leads to a hesitation to implement policy as safety and security precede dynamism and functional failures are invariably linked to corruption. This applies to other spheres of economic functioning also — administrative, financial or legal.