You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

Flipkart no more bellwether of e-tail valuations

Loses notional value by 37.5% because of markdowns by investors


Karan Choudhury  |  New Delhi 

Flipkart no more bellwether of e-tail valuations

    Indian e-commerce platforms help sellers get easy loans to aid growth

    Measuring who's ahead in e-commerce

    Retail e-commerce players jostle for leadership slots

    Govt infra helps firms take e-commerce to villages

    Turmoil, shake-out in e-commerce space

Flipkart, poster boy of Indian e-commerce, seems to be losing its bellwether status. While the Bengaluru-based company has witnessed four consecutive markdowns by global venture capital funds, the same trend is not reflecting in the valuations of other prominent e-commerce players.

The markdowns, though notional, have narrowed the gap between the valuation of and closest rival Snapdeal. While Flipkart's valuation has dipped from $15.2 billion to $9.5 billion in the past few months, pushing it back to the 2014 level, Snapdeal is a close second with a $6.5-billion valuation.

The caveat, however, is that it is only when a company is in the market to raise funds that the real valuation can be known. Flipkart's previous major fund-raising was pegged at $700 million in June 2015, at a valuation of $15.2 billion. Snapdeal raised $200 million in February 2016, at a valuation of $6.5 billion.

In February this year, Morgan Stanley marked down its stake in to $103.97 per share, 27 per cent lower than the price at which shares of were bought during the last fundraising. This reduced the value of India's biggest online retailer to $11 billion. Subsequently, mutual fund house T Rowe Price reduced the value of its stake in Flipkart by 15 per cent.

Flipkart no more bellwether of e-tail valuations
The latest hit came as a double whammy last week when mutual fund investors - Fidelity Rutland Square Trust II and VALIC Co - marked down the value of their holdings in Flipkart by 20 per cent. Some market experts say the latest markdowns have reduced Flipkart's valuation to around $9.5 billion.

"Agreed, the markdowns are all notional and the real test would be when all these go out looking for funds. But if there is one more markdown, Flipkart might just end up losing the top spot to the number two player. Such valuations are important to these as this is how the market sentiments function," said a senior consultant from a global financial firm.

Flipkart has seen 12 rounds of equity funding worth $3 billion. In December 2014, its valuation went up to $15.2 billion, from $11 billion earlier.

While previously, Flipkart's valuation was used as measuring scale by investors to set the value of other e-commerce players in India, the recent markdowns have had little effect on other Unicorns such as Snapdeal, or Paytm, experts said.

"At present, the markdown has only been for Flipkart. Others have not seen it. This, to an extent, shows it is not a market-wide phenomenon. We believe this happened because Flipkart, while doing well in some spheres, was not able to keep up its targets," said an analyst. However, he added, "It does not mean such markdowns will not happen to Flipkart's competitors."

To be fair to Flipkart, in the recent past, Morgan Stanley, T Rowe Price and Fidelity have marked down their other investments also. Morgan Stanley has done a markdown in data crunching company Palantir by 32 per cent, and in file storage company Dropbox by 25 per cent.

Fidelity marked down its investments in Dropbox, Snapchat and Zenefits. T Rowe Price marked down its stake in Dropbox by more than 50 per cent, as well as in global cab aggregator Uber.

Some market experts believe such markdowns are normal and success or failure of a company cannot be gauged by this. "Such a drop in valuation is a momentary phase, similar to rise or fall of a share in the stock market. We cannot just decide on the success or failure of a company on this basis. Global mutual funds have to file the details of their investments with the government authorities and the markdowns are done in line with the present status of their investments. It does not mean the global investors have lost faith in a particular company," said Anil Kumar, founder and CEO of RedSeer Consulting, a research and advisory firm.

Recently, Flipkart co-founder Sachin Bansal said the markdown by an investment firm was a theoretical exercise, and not based on any transaction.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Mon, May 09 2016. 00:58 IST