The KV Kamath Committee’s recommendations on debt restructuring have not helped India’s beleaguered hospitality sector — one of the worst impacted by the pandemic.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on September 7, under the ambit of the Kamath Committee, allowed corporates to avail of loan restructuring for a period of two years, limited to debt distressed solely due to the pandemic. However, the fate of hotel owners with high debt pile continues to hang in balance.
Thee parameters set by the committee include total outside liabilities to the adjusted tangible net worth (TOL/ATNW), current ratio, total debt/Ebitda, average debt service coverage ratio, and debt service coverage ratio.
Industry executives said the qualifying benchmarks would benefit only a few hotels, pointing that it was now up to the RBI and individual banks to favourably review deserving cases.
“Unfortunately, the Committee recommendations in terms of qualifying benchmarks have not been favourable for most hotel companies,” said Vineet Verma, executive director and chief executive at Bridget Hospitality.
K B Kachru, vice-president of Hotel Association of India, said the industry appreciated that the committee took cognizance of the stress facing the sector. “Majority of the hotel owners are not eligible for loan restructuring due to the stringent financial ratios. It is not helping those in distress.”
The panel, however, clarified that the financial ratios would be applicable prospectively and not retrospectively. “This has been clarified to banks,” said a panel member. This has been done taking into consideration the severe impact of the pandemic on sectors like aviation and hospitality and the long road to recovery ahead of them, he said.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on September 7, under the ambit of the Kamath Committee, allowed corporates to avail of loan restructuring for a period of two years, limited to debt distressed solely due to the pandemic. However, the fate of hotel owners with high debt pile continues to hang in balance.
Thee parameters set by the committee include total outside liabilities to the adjusted tangible net worth (TOL/ATNW), current ratio, total debt/Ebitda, average debt service coverage ratio, and debt service coverage ratio.
Industry executives said the qualifying benchmarks would benefit only a few hotels, pointing that it was now up to the RBI and individual banks to favourably review deserving cases.
“Unfortunately, the Committee recommendations in terms of qualifying benchmarks have not been favourable for most hotel companies,” said Vineet Verma, executive director and chief executive at Bridget Hospitality.
K B Kachru, vice-president of Hotel Association of India, said the industry appreciated that the committee took cognizance of the stress facing the sector. “Majority of the hotel owners are not eligible for loan restructuring due to the stringent financial ratios. It is not helping those in distress.”
The panel, however, clarified that the financial ratios would be applicable prospectively and not retrospectively. “This has been clarified to banks,” said a panel member. This has been done taking into consideration the severe impact of the pandemic on sectors like aviation and hospitality and the long road to recovery ahead of them, he said.

)