You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » National
Business Standard

25% researchers worldwide unaware, confused what is plagiarism: Survey

Majority reported that reusing text from their own previously published study is not plagiarism, irrespective of whether the study is cited

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Indian management education

At least 25 per cent of researchers worldwide have a poor understanding of and ethics, according to a new

The report titled "Perspectives on Academic Publishing: Global Report 2018" provides insights into various aspects of research publication such as challenges authors face in manuscript preparation, communicating with journals and responding to peer reviewer comments.

Over 7000 researchers from India, Republic of Korea, Japan, and were interviewed for the conducted by Editage, a global firm.

"A substantial proportion of respondents (25 pc) were unaware of or confused about what constitutes and duplicate submission or who qualifies for authorship. In addition, 31 per cent were not familiar with established ethics-related bodies and guidelines such as Committee on Publication (COPE) or (ICMJE).

"However, a relatively small proportion reported facing difficulty in ethical compliance when preparing a submission. This points to a gap in understanding of ethical issues that publishers, journals should consider addressing through better education," the survey report said.

The report further said ," a quarter or more of the respondents were unaware that it is to reword peers' ideas without citing their papers or to quote them verbatim without using quotation marks. Respondents seemed more confused about or unaware of what constitutes self-plagiarism".

"The majority reported that reusing text from their own previously published study is not plagiarism, irrespective of whether the study is cited," it added.

About 76 per cent respondents found preparation of manuscript the most difficult part of publication of a research in an international journal while about 66 per cent of the respondents felt that journal guidelines were unclear, incomplete or both.

"The difficulty level seems directly related to English-language proficiency. The publishing industry needs to deliberate on how to eliminate or minimize this additional burden on non-English-speaking authors so that journals do not miss out on scientifically strong research because authors choose to submit in regional-language journals," the report said.

First Published: Thu, November 29 2018. 18:15 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU