You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » National
Business Standard

Govt knew of NSEL scam more than a year ago

April 2012 notice said data obtained by FMC indicated exchange didn't seek stocks from borrowers

Malini Bhupta  |  Mumbai 

Other than investors/lenders, everyone, including the management of Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL), the Forwards Markets Commission (FMC) and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, knew, since long, there was no physical stock of any commodity against which money was being borrowed on the exchange.

A copy of a show-cause notice by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs to the NSEL chief executive in April 2012 said, “NSEL has not made it mandatory for the seller to actually deposit goods in the warehouse before taking a short-position through a member of the exchange. The exchange system has no stock check facility that validates the member’s position. The exchange allows trading on the exchange platform without verifying whether the seller member has the stocks with him or not. In this way, the exchange has violated conditions stipulated that no short-sale for the members of the exchange shall be allowed.”

The notice added the FMC had found of the total contracts, 55 offered for trade by NSEL had settlement periods exceeding 11 days and that NSEL was never granted any exemption on non-transferable delivery-based contracts. “Therefore, all contracts traded on NSEL with settlement period exceeding 11 days are a violation of the provisions of the FC(R) Act.”


It also questioned why action shouldn’t be taken against the exchange within 15 days of the receipt of the letter.

When contacted, an NSEL spokesperson said, “NSEL had replied to the ministry’s show-cause notice in details at that time. But instructions from the government came only in July 2013 for stopping the launch of new contracts and, subsequently, for squaring off open position for all contracts.”

Observers said this meant the government and the exchange already knew physical stocks were never mandated form borrowers/sellers, but this wasn’t conveyed to the lenders or buyers of contracts.

A broker who is part of the investor forum fighting the NSEL says, “The show-cause suggests the government and the exchange knew there was no stock, though the broking community did not know this. Also, if the government knew of this, why was action taken only in August 2013?”

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Fri, October 04 2013. 00:32 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.