You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

SC upholds Madras High Court's restriction of input tax refunds on services

Matter relates to industries facing inverted duty structure

Supreme Court | Madras High Court | tax refunds

Indivjal Dhasmana  |  New Delhi 

goods and services tax, gst
In this connection, the apex court quashed the Gujarat high court judgement

The has upheld the order of restricting input for services used by industries facing inverted duty structure under the goods and services tax (GST) regime. The order may affect cash flow of pharma, fertiliser, footwear and textile industries.

In this connection, the apex court quashed the Gujarat high court judgement.

The two lower courts had earlier given contradictory judgements.

While the had upheld the Rule 89 (5) inserted by the government under the CGST Act on restricting such input as valid. It was contrary to Gujarat high court order which had struck down the rule.

Inverted duty structure means that companies face higher GST rates on raw materials than on finished goods. While the GST Council has addressed the issue of inverted duty structure for many industries including telecom, it still persists for textiles, footwear, pharma and fertilizer industries.

The government had brought in the rule in 2018 by amending an earlier one that allowed all kinds of credits, regardless of whether the taxes were paid on goods or on services.

While finding anomalies in a formula for computing input given in the rule, the refrained from reading it down but asked the GST Council to reconsider it, pointed out Abhishek Jain, tax partner EY.

"The industry players would hope that the government would reconsider the anomalies and recraft the formula in a better manner," he said.

Jain said the apex court has removed the doubts that arose after the contradictory views by the high courts of Madras and Gujarat. Parag Mehta, partner, NA Shah Associates, however, said with the judgement, the impacted industries will have a scenario with substantial amounts blocked in input tax and no possibility of refund leading to working capital issues.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Mon, September 13 2021. 19:07 IST