You are here: Home » International » News » Markets
Business Standard

Dumping stocks to punish bad corporate behavior has tiny impact

Even as billions of dollars diverts toward firms scoring higher on environmental, social and governance measures, the funding costs for bad actors has hardly budged, a study has found

Topics
stocks | corporate | ESG funds

Tasneem Hanfi Brögger & Sam Potter | Bloomberg 

Even as billions of dollars diverts toward firms scoring higher on environmental, the funding costs for bad actors has hardly budged
The most eye-catching corporate changes have been brought about by active investors.

Investors that ditch companies with poor ESG standards in the hope of forcing them to do better should look away now: According to new research, you’re wasting your time.

Even as billions of dollars diverts toward firms scoring higher on environmental, social and governance measures, the funding costs for bad actors has hardly budged, a study has found.

It suggests that shifting behaviour in the world is unlikely to be achieved by portfolio allocation — which has long been the dominant approach on Wall Street and beyond.

“A substantial increase in the amount of socially conscious capital is required for the strategy to affect policy,” authors Jonathan Berk and Jules Van Binsbergen wrote in the paper. “Given the current levels of socially conscious capital, a more effective strategy to put that capital to use is to follow a policy of engagement.”

The research, published in late August, addresses one of the key dilemmas at the heart of ESG investing: Is it better to punish companies that fall short by selling out, or to stay vested and try to bring about improvements through active ownership?


Perhaps because it’s easier, a lot of ESG strategies have evolved around the former approach. So Berk and Van Binsbergen — from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Wharton School, respectively — started with the assumption that effective divesting should result in higher costs of capital for the company that’s been sold.

By tracking the amount of “socially conscious capital,” the targeted companies and those firms’ correlation to the rest of the market, the pair found the impact on the cost of capital was “too small to meaningfully affect real investment decisions.”

It’s a conclusion with plenty of anecdotal evidence to back it up.

This year some of the biggest emitters of carbon dioxide in the world have enjoyed sizable share-price gains, including ExxonMobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips. Glencore, which has been blacklisted by the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund since May 2020 due to its exposure to coal, is up more than 50 per cent.

Meanwhile, the most eye-catching changes have been brought about by active investors. Engine No. 1 famously won three board seats at Exxon earlier this year after a long proxy fight. Its debut exchange-traded fund pledges to use its shareholder rights to affect change, rather than divestment. Its ticker? VOTE.

In the paper, “The Impact of Impact Investing,” Berk and Van Binsbergen conclude that divesting is unlikely to have a meaningful impact in the future because socially responsible capital is such a small part of the total.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Sat, October 09 2021. 02:25 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.