You are here: Home » Markets » Features
Business Standard

Opposition to Manappuram move for PE special rights

Advisory firm asks shareholders to vote against gold loan firm?s proposed alteration of articles in favour of some institutional investors

N Sundaresha Subramanian & Samie Modak  |  Mumbai 

Institutional Investors Advisory Services (IIAS), a proxy advisory, has opposed a proposal by Manappuram Finance, a leading gold loan firm, to give certain special rights to a set of institutional shareholders. IIAS has advised minority shareholders to oppose this move, as it would give such institutions an unfair advantage over other shareholders.

In its annual general meeting scheduled on August 2, Manappuram is planning to move a special resolution, seeking to alter its Articles of Association. The Articles are a statutory document required to be maintained by every company, detailing its internal rules and regulations.

Manappuram says the change is required to reflect the terms and conditions of definitive agreements entered into with some of its institutional investors. According to IIAS, the proposal is for incorporating certain additional rights to Hudson Equity Holdings, AA Development Capital India Fund 1 LLC, and a set of investors referred to as ‘Subsequent Investors (Sequoia, Barings, etc) and Others’.
 

UNFAIR ADVANTAGE
  • Mannapuram seeking shareholder approvals to alter articles of association
  • Amendment to give special rights to some institutions
  • Hudson Capital, AA Development, Barings and Sequoia to be beneficiaries
  • IIAS opposes the move, recommends voting against resolution
  • Company in silent period

“As this is a listed entity, the amendments mentioned in the proposal give additional rights to one set of shareholders. We believe these rights should fall off once a company is listed. IIAS strongly recommends voting against the resolution,” the advisory firm said in a note issued on Wednesday. Hudson Equity Holdings, the investment vehicle of India Equity Partners, holds 8.54 per cent in the company and has nominated a director on the company’s board. AA Development Capital Fund owns 3.5 per cent, with a director on board.

Baring India Private Equity owns 3.01 per cent. Hudson Equity Holdings, the investment vehicle of India Equity Partners, holds 8.54 per cent in the company and has nominated a director on the company’s board. AA Development Capital Fund owns 3.5 per cent, with a director on board. Baring India Private Equity owns 3.01 per cent.

The additional rights Manappuram seeks to bestow on these institutions include anti-dilution rights, adjustments upon issuance of additional equity shares, adjustments for reclassification, exchange and substitution, and preference to specific investors on the occurrence of a liquidation event prior to conversion of the preference shares, the IIAS note said.

The shareholder agreements also specify that “till such time that either of the subsequent investors (ie Barings and Sequoia) hold at least one per cent shares, the following matters shall specifically require the prior approval of the board”. The items under this clause include transactions, agreements or arrangements between the company and any related parties in a financial year exceeding Rs 1 crore, change in statutory auditor or internal auditors, change in compliance officer, termination or modification of the terms of existing employment/services of key personnel, including I Unnikrishnan and B N Raveendra Babu”.

I Unnikrishnan, managing director of Manappuram, said: “We are currently in our silent period (the no-comment phase companies keep in the run-up to publication of their results). We can only talk on this after August 1.”

Private equity firms typically enter into such shareholder agreements with companies before issue of an Initial Public Offer. After listing, such shareholder agreements are generally considered invalid. “It is standard to have such agreements. But once listed, these rights should go. It is not in accordance with global standards to have such agreements in listed firms, as it gives one set of shareholders unfair advantage ,” said Amit Tandon, managing director, IIAS.

It is not clear at what stage these agreements were entered into and why the company is now trying to alter its articles. “If these agreements are entered into after listing, then it’s shameful,”Tandon added.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, July 26 2012. 00:37 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.