You are here: Home » News-IANS » Business-Economy
Business Standard

Bengaluru group urges consensus on National Water Framework Law

IANS  |  Bengaluru 

In view of recurring crises like the recent Cauvery water-related dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, a local think tank formed by The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) has called on stakeholders to reach an expeditious consensus on the provisions of the bill for a National Water Framework Law proposed by the Centre.

"The National Water Commission and the National Framework Law for water are important to establish the principles of governance in the water sector, and to speed up the Water Resources Information System to provide hard data," the TERI Bangalore Sustainable Development Group said in a statement following a meeting here earlier this week to discuss water sector issues.

"The idea of a National Water Framework Law (NWFL) proposed by the central government has, however, received a push-back from the states. Under the Indian Constitution, water is primarily a State subject, but it is an important national concern," it said.

The Bengaluru group said various aspects, including the judicial recognition of the right to water as a fundamental component of the right to life, the sense of an imminent crisis in water, the need to conserve, the pollution of rivers and other water sources, "and the inter-use and inter-state conflicts due to water have placed responsibilities on the central government to address water as a national issue".

"The NWFL should be discussed comprehensively to arrive at a consensus among stakeholders on the provisions of the Bill, and the policies of other sectors should be aligned with the water sector policies."

In this connection, former Secretary in the Water Resources Ministry and currently Distinguished Fellow at TERI Syamal K. Sarkar noted in the meeting that a glaring example that required addressing is of free electricity for agriculture in some states, which often runs counter to the water conservation efforts of the same state governments.

"Water is an emotive and volatile issue, and its political resolution is difficult. There is need to move away from the emotive aspects to basing policy decisions in water on hard data," the statement said.

The Supreme Court earlier this week said it would consider if the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal should have gone into river water agreements between the then Madras Presidency and erstwhile ruler of the Mysore State in 1892 and 1924 in determining the quantum of water for Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and others.

A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, started its final hearing on the civil appeals filed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Puducherry against the final decision of the tribunal of 2007.

The Tribunal, set up in 1990, announced its final order in 2007 allocating 419 thousand million cubic feet (tmcft) water to Tamil Nadu and 270 tmcft to Karnataka. Kerala was given 30 tmcft and Puducherry 7 tmcft. According to the tribunal, the total availability of water in the Cauvery basin stood at 740 tmcft.



(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Sun, February 12 2017. 18:28 IST