You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

HC gives nod for PG med admissions, disallows incentive marks

Press Trust of India  |  Chennai 

Allowing an appeal of the government partly, a vacation bench of the today directed it to complete post graduate medical admissions for 2018-19 as per schedule, except awarding incentive marks to a category based on specialisation.

A vacation bench, comprising Justices V Pathiban and P D observed that 'A3' category doctors should not be awarded any incentive marks as they are not entitled for it.

The matter relates to awarding incentive marks to in-service doctors working in rural, difficult areas for admission in post graduate medical courses.

The court said so far as the categorisation of A3 (which covers posts, including those in trauma and neonatal Intensive Care Units) was concerned, a separate classification has been made solely on the basis of areas of specialisation.

Hence, it does not meet the objective envisaged in the Medical Council of Regulations, 2000, that covers providing incentive marks.

As regards categorisation of A 1 and A 2, covering in-service doctors in remote and difficult areas, these norms do not suffer from any legal or factual infirmity as a whole, and it cannot be invalidated, the court said.

The government had constituted a six member committee headed by P Umanath, Managing Director, Medical Services Corporation, to identify difficult and remote areas for awarding incentive marks to in-service doctors for admission in PG Medical Courses.

The committee, in its report, categorised the areas as A, B and C and furnished the same to the government, which later issued two government orders under the above categorisation.

Originally, this was challenged by some doctors, stating that the categorisation was not in accordance with the orders and not in accordance with the Medical Council of India's Regulations.

Single Judge S Vaidyanathan after quashing both the government orders directed the government to re-do the categorisation.

Justice Vaidyanathan had directed that the categorisation be based on only geographical parameters as per the rules and in accordance with teh directions, against which the filed an appeal before the division bench.

The vacation bench, allowing the appeal partly, said though the recommendation of the expert committee on categorisation does not strictly fall in line with the apex court directions, the entire exercise was not completely erroneous either.

The bench, while considering the litigations on admissions to medical courses suggested to the government that the expert committee may be headed by a retired

The suggestion was to avoid recurrence of litigations on categorisation of doctors for availing benefit of additional weightage as per the norms.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, May 17 2018. 22:30 IST