Delhi High Court today agreed to hear a PIL seeking direction to the Indian Army not to euthanise service dogs after their retirement or when they are found unfit and inactive, observing that the killings violated the law.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath listed for consideration on September 9 the matter relating to killing the dogs which have served national security by sniffing bombs, hunting down enemies, finding hidden places and fetching evidence.
The court listed the matter after Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain informed it that the Defence Ministry was formulating a policy with regard to the issues raised in the PIL.
ASG Jain told the court that government was working on plans and "will soon" come out with a policy to stop the killings and make arrangements for Army service dogs upon their retirement.
The court observed that the respondents were admitting that the current practice of putting the army service dogs to sleep was against the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
The bench was hearing a PIL filed by advocate Sanjay Kumar Singh, who alleged that the "act of the Indian Army in killing their service stocks once their service years are over is so unreasonable ... Given that these service dogs render as high a patriotic service to the nation as any other by running consistently risk to their lives and limbs in undertaking jobs of providing security to the citizens of this nation against various grave threats and dangers".
The plea sought direction to the Ministry and the Army Headquarters that dogs shall not be killed by Indian Army except "when advised so as the last recourse by quality, considered medical opinion on grounds of such abnormally aggressive behaviour as to pose a risk to the safety of others including its fellow service dogs and handlers".
