You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

US in new global court showdown with Iran

AFP  |  The Hague 

The will confront at the UN's top court on Monday over billions in frozen assets, in a case that could deepen the Trump administration's rift with international justice.

had dragged before the in June 2016 to oppose a ruling that the USD 2 billion should go to victims of terror attacks blamed on the Islamic republic.

Monday's hearing of US objections against Iran's appeal comes a week after the ICJ in a separate case ordered the to ease sanctions reimposed after pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal with

Both the assets and the sanctions cases are based on a 1955 "Treaty of Amity" between and that predates Iran's Islamic revolution.

Last Wednesday the announced it was not only tearing up the 1955 treaty but also that it was quitting the international accord relating to the UN top court's jurisdiction.

It remained unclear how will respond to the latest case before the court but US officials confirmed that its lawyers will be present at the hearing on Monday.

The ICJ was set up after World War II to rule on disputes between member states. Its rulings are binding but it has no power to enforce them.

At Monday's hearing a 15-judge bench is to listen to arguments by Washington's lawyers over whether the ICJ can take up the case under its strict rules governing its procedure.

The ruled in April 2016 that USD 2 billion in Iran's frozen assets must go to American victims of terror attacks.

These included the 1983 bombing of a US Marine barracks in in which 241 soldiers were killed and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in

In total the decision affects more than 1,000 Americans.

angrily accused Washington of breaking the 1955 treaty -- even though it was signed at the time with the pro-US regime of the Shah -- and called for the US "to make full reparations to Iran for the violation of its international legal obligations."

said that because the US has maintained its designation of Iran as a major state sponsor of terrorism, its assets including the Central Bank also known as the Bank Markazi, have been "subjected to enforcement proceedings in the United States" even if they should benefit from immunity under the 1955 treaty.

A decision by the ICJ's judges could take weeks or even months before being made public.

Iran won a shock victory last week when the ICJ ruled that the US must lift sanctions against Tehran targeting humanitarian goods like and medicine.

In response, US said the was terminating the 1955 friendship treaty.

But Trump's also announced that the United States was pulling out of the 1961 Optional Protocol and Dispute Resolution of the Vienna Convention.

The protocol establishes the ICJ as the "compulsory jurisdiction" for disputes unless nations decide to settle them elsewhere.

The step also comes after the Palestinians went to the ICJ to challenge the US move of its embassy to

Trump last month at the virulently rejected the authority of the -- a separate court based in that the US is not a member of -- over a probe into US forces in

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, October 08 2018. 08:40 IST