You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » Environment
Business Standard

Use the power of the Air Act to fight pollution

What is required is political will to wield legal authority

Margo Oge 

Air Pollution

The mind-numbing results of a major global study released last week by the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation highlight once again the severity of the crisis in India.
 
The problem is not that India has made no effort to reduce Air-quality monitoring across the country has been stepped up. for power plants have been proposed although they are in danger of being diluted or delayed. Perhaps most important, the central government mandated that new passenger and transport vehicles meet by 2020, and lowered the limits on sulphur content of fuels. In the special case of the national capital region, a graded emergency action plan has now been prepared.
 
Yet, these and other ongoing efforts are unlikely to improve the air quality situation to the point where pollutant levels meet the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Why? A recent report from the Centre for Science and has a few of the answers.
 
First, India has not set any self-imposed deadline for meeting the Nor does any city or state faces economic and legal consequences for missing the air-quality goals. Contrast that with the situation in the US, where each state must prepare an implementation plan for cities within the state that do not meet pollution limits and face economic and legal consequences for missing the air quality goals. In India, state pollution control boards (SPCB) and cities have prepared such plans only in response to court orders, and without regular updates or oversight.
 
Second, the rarely if ever exercise their powers to prevent usage of dirty fuels and equipment, burning of garbage and agricultural residues, or pollution from industrial plants.
 
Third, although the Protection Act (EP Act) of 1986 gives the power to regulate vehicular emissions within their jurisdictions, the currently have no control over vehicle emission certification, in-use emissions testing, or enforcement — which renders that power illusory. In the future, should get involved in carrying out in-use surveillance testing in collaboration with vehicle testing agencies to ensure that the on-road emissions of vehicles match the certification values.
 
One plausible solution is to consolidate all aspects of vehicle emissions and fuel quality regulations under the provisions of the Air Act of 1981 and the Protection Act of 1986. Vehicular accounts for a quarter to a third of the pollution burden in cities across India. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the cannot be held responsible for not meeting the if they cannot clamp down on one of the major sources of
 
No changes would be needed in the Air Act or EP Act; indeed, India’s first vehicular exhaust (in 1990) and fuel quality specifications (1996) were set under the EP Act. Nor do the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act prevent the EP Act from creating an oversight body or from giving detailed instructions to any agency. The power to give directions and set rules to regulate environmental pollution under the EP Act are broad and consistent with the public health objectives of the law. Since the primary goal of is to improve public health, it makes more sense to regulate those emissions using the powers of the Air Act.
 
The courts have intervened aggressively in air-quality matters, much to the chagrin of some stakeholders. Such judicial intervention would become less necessary, however, if the air-quality management process in India were streamlined, and all sources of pollution monitored, regulated, and corresponding standards enforced under the detailed guidelines issued by the ministry.
 
As the dismal statistics from the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation on premature mortality caused by remind us that the fight against has only just begun. Whether India is able to win this war will depend on clear regulatory structure and responsibilities at the central, state, and local level, with clear targets, enforcement mechanisms including economic and other penalties for non-compliance.
 
It is within our power to see that all Indians are able to breathe What is necessary is the political will to wield existing legal authority, and to pursue that aim with sufficient determination.


The author is a former director of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality at the US Environmental Protection Agency, and a member of the Volkswagen International Sustainability Council

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Use the power of the Air Act to fight pollution

What is required is political will to wield legal authority

What is required is political will to wield legal authority The mind-numbing results of a major global study released last week by the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation highlight once again the severity of the crisis in India.
 
The problem is not that India has made no effort to reduce Air-quality monitoring across the country has been stepped up. for power plants have been proposed although they are in danger of being diluted or delayed. Perhaps most important, the central government mandated that new passenger and transport vehicles meet by 2020, and lowered the limits on sulphur content of fuels. In the special case of the national capital region, a graded emergency action plan has now been prepared.
 
Yet, these and other ongoing efforts are unlikely to improve the air quality situation to the point where pollutant levels meet the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Why? A recent report from the Centre for Science and has a few of the answers.
 
First, India has not set any self-imposed deadline for meeting the Nor does any city or state faces economic and legal consequences for missing the air-quality goals. Contrast that with the situation in the US, where each state must prepare an implementation plan for cities within the state that do not meet pollution limits and face economic and legal consequences for missing the air quality goals. In India, state pollution control boards (SPCB) and cities have prepared such plans only in response to court orders, and without regular updates or oversight.
 
Second, the rarely if ever exercise their powers to prevent usage of dirty fuels and equipment, burning of garbage and agricultural residues, or pollution from industrial plants.
 
Third, although the Protection Act (EP Act) of 1986 gives the power to regulate vehicular emissions within their jurisdictions, the currently have no control over vehicle emission certification, in-use emissions testing, or enforcement — which renders that power illusory. In the future, should get involved in carrying out in-use surveillance testing in collaboration with vehicle testing agencies to ensure that the on-road emissions of vehicles match the certification values.
 
One plausible solution is to consolidate all aspects of vehicle emissions and fuel quality regulations under the provisions of the Air Act of 1981 and the Protection Act of 1986. Vehicular accounts for a quarter to a third of the pollution burden in cities across India. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the cannot be held responsible for not meeting the if they cannot clamp down on one of the major sources of
 
No changes would be needed in the Air Act or EP Act; indeed, India’s first vehicular exhaust (in 1990) and fuel quality specifications (1996) were set under the EP Act. Nor do the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act prevent the EP Act from creating an oversight body or from giving detailed instructions to any agency. The power to give directions and set rules to regulate environmental pollution under the EP Act are broad and consistent with the public health objectives of the law. Since the primary goal of is to improve public health, it makes more sense to regulate those emissions using the powers of the Air Act.
 
The courts have intervened aggressively in air-quality matters, much to the chagrin of some stakeholders. Such judicial intervention would become less necessary, however, if the air-quality management process in India were streamlined, and all sources of pollution monitored, regulated, and corresponding standards enforced under the detailed guidelines issued by the ministry.
 
As the dismal statistics from the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation on premature mortality caused by remind us that the fight against has only just begun. Whether India is able to win this war will depend on clear regulatory structure and responsibilities at the central, state, and local level, with clear targets, enforcement mechanisms including economic and other penalties for non-compliance.
 
It is within our power to see that all Indians are able to breathe What is necessary is the political will to wield existing legal authority, and to pursue that aim with sufficient determination.
The author is a former director of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality at the US Environmental Protection Agency, and a member of the Volkswagen International Sustainability Council
image
Business Standard
177 22

Use the power of the Air Act to fight pollution

What is required is political will to wield legal authority

The mind-numbing results of a major global study released last week by the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation highlight once again the severity of the crisis in India.
 
The problem is not that India has made no effort to reduce Air-quality monitoring across the country has been stepped up. for power plants have been proposed although they are in danger of being diluted or delayed. Perhaps most important, the central government mandated that new passenger and transport vehicles meet by 2020, and lowered the limits on sulphur content of fuels. In the special case of the national capital region, a graded emergency action plan has now been prepared.
 
Yet, these and other ongoing efforts are unlikely to improve the air quality situation to the point where pollutant levels meet the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Why? A recent report from the Centre for Science and has a few of the answers.
 
First, India has not set any self-imposed deadline for meeting the Nor does any city or state faces economic and legal consequences for missing the air-quality goals. Contrast that with the situation in the US, where each state must prepare an implementation plan for cities within the state that do not meet pollution limits and face economic and legal consequences for missing the air quality goals. In India, state pollution control boards (SPCB) and cities have prepared such plans only in response to court orders, and without regular updates or oversight.
 
Second, the rarely if ever exercise their powers to prevent usage of dirty fuels and equipment, burning of garbage and agricultural residues, or pollution from industrial plants.
 
Third, although the Protection Act (EP Act) of 1986 gives the power to regulate vehicular emissions within their jurisdictions, the currently have no control over vehicle emission certification, in-use emissions testing, or enforcement — which renders that power illusory. In the future, should get involved in carrying out in-use surveillance testing in collaboration with vehicle testing agencies to ensure that the on-road emissions of vehicles match the certification values.
 
One plausible solution is to consolidate all aspects of vehicle emissions and fuel quality regulations under the provisions of the Air Act of 1981 and the Protection Act of 1986. Vehicular accounts for a quarter to a third of the pollution burden in cities across India. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the cannot be held responsible for not meeting the if they cannot clamp down on one of the major sources of
 
No changes would be needed in the Air Act or EP Act; indeed, India’s first vehicular exhaust (in 1990) and fuel quality specifications (1996) were set under the EP Act. Nor do the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act prevent the EP Act from creating an oversight body or from giving detailed instructions to any agency. The power to give directions and set rules to regulate environmental pollution under the EP Act are broad and consistent with the public health objectives of the law. Since the primary goal of is to improve public health, it makes more sense to regulate those emissions using the powers of the Air Act.
 
The courts have intervened aggressively in air-quality matters, much to the chagrin of some stakeholders. Such judicial intervention would become less necessary, however, if the air-quality management process in India were streamlined, and all sources of pollution monitored, regulated, and corresponding standards enforced under the detailed guidelines issued by the ministry.
 
As the dismal statistics from the Health Effects Institute and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation on premature mortality caused by remind us that the fight against has only just begun. Whether India is able to win this war will depend on clear regulatory structure and responsibilities at the central, state, and local level, with clear targets, enforcement mechanisms including economic and other penalties for non-compliance.
 
It is within our power to see that all Indians are able to breathe What is necessary is the political will to wield existing legal authority, and to pursue that aim with sufficient determination.


The author is a former director of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality at the US Environmental Protection Agency, and a member of the Volkswagen International Sustainability Council

image
Business Standard
177 22