You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

SAT dismisses Shivinder Singh's plea against Sebi's loan recall order

SAT said Singh was a director and promoter in both the companies when the alleged diversion of funds took place

Topics
Securities Appellate Tribunal | SEBI | Fortis Healhcare

Press Trust of India 

Shivinder Mohan Singh
Further, the tribunal said Singh's contention that he has nothing to do with diversion of funds cannot be accepted in principle at this stage

The (SAT) has dismissed an appeal of Shivinder Mohan Singh, former promoter of Fortis Healthcare, against Sebi's order asking Religare Enterprises and Religare Finvest to recall loans.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), through an interim order in March 2019, had asked Religare Enterprises and Religare Finvest to initiate steps to recall loans worth Rs 2,065 crore extended to Singh and several other entities.

Funds were diverted from the books of Religare Finvest for utilisation of promoters and promoter group entities of Religare Enterprises, as per the interim order.

The direction came after the regulator received complaints alleging financial mismanagement and diversion of funds in Religare Finvest, a subsidiary of Religare Enterprises.

A confirmatory order was passed in September 2019. Following Sebi's confirmatory order, Singh approached SAT.

Dismissing his plea, SAT said Singh was a director and promoter in both the when the alleged diversion of funds took place.

Further, the tribunal said Singh's contention that he has nothing to do with diversion of funds cannot be accepted in principle at this stage.

"We are not inclined to interfere in the impugned orders at this belated stage. The appeal fails and is dismissed with a direction that the WTM (whole time member) will decide the matter within six months from the date the appellant (Singh) files his objection/reply to the show cause notice," the tribunal said in an order passed on December 24.

Singh's counsel had challenged Sebi's order arguing that the regulator's confirmatory order directing recalling of loans is illegal.

The order, which is in nature of a disgorgement, cannot be passed at a stage when investigation initiated by is still under progress, the counsel argued.

It was contended that such an order, which has the element of finality, could only be passed after a complete inquiry.

Singh also contended that he had no role in diversion of funds and accused other noticees of orchestrating the alleged diversion.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Mon, January 04 2021. 22:36 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.